Yevzlin Alexander S, Sanchez Robert J, Hiatt Jeanne G, Washington Marilyn H, Wakeen Maureen, Hofmann R Michael, Becker Yolanda T
University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin 53713, USA.
Semin Dial. 2007 Jul-Aug;20(4):351-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2007.00294.x.
Vascular access complications, including thrombosis, are associated with significant patient morbidity and mortality. Currently, up to 60% of new patients and 30% of prevalent patients are using a catheter for dialysis. To prevent interdialytic catheter thrombosis, these devices are routinely locked with concentrated heparin solutions. Several recent studies have elucidated the potential for abnormal coagulation markers (aPTT) that may arise from this practice. This abnormal elevation in aPTT may be explained by significant early and late leakage from the catheter that occurs after performing a catheter lock. To date no study has evaluated the impact of this practice, or the elevation in aPTT that may result from it, on bleeding complication rates. We conducted a retrospective analysis comparing bleeding rates in subjects who received concentrated heparin catheter lock (5000 u/cc) [group 1, n = 52] to those who received citrate or dilute heparin catheter lock (1000 u/cc) [group 2, n = 91] immediately after tunneled hemodialysis catheter insertion. Baseline characteristics did not differ between the groups except for the preprocedure INR, which was higher in the postpolicy group compared with the prepolicy group (1.29 vs. 1.21, p = 0.04). Results from logistic regression analyses revealed that the likelihood of a composite bleeding event in group 1 was 11.9 times that of a composite bleeding event in group 2, p = 0.04. Concentrated heparin (5000 u/ml) is associated with increased major bleeding complications posttunneled catheter placement compared with low-dose heparin (1000 u/ml) or citrate catheter lock solution, p = 0.02. Given the findings of this study, a randomized controlled trial comparing the safety and efficacy of common anticoagulation lock solutions is warranted.
包括血栓形成在内的血管通路并发症与患者的高发病率和死亡率相关。目前,高达60%的新患者和30%的长期患者在使用导管进行透析。为预防透析间期导管血栓形成,这些装置通常用浓缩肝素溶液封管。最近的几项研究阐明了这种做法可能导致异常凝血指标(活化部分凝血活酶时间[aPTT])升高的可能性。aPTT的这种异常升高可能是由于封管后导管出现明显的早期和晚期渗漏所致。迄今为止,尚无研究评估这种做法或其可能导致的aPTT升高对出血并发症发生率的影响。我们进行了一项回顾性分析,比较了在隧道式血液透析导管插入后立即接受浓缩肝素封管(5000单位/毫升)的受试者[第1组,n = 52]与接受枸橼酸盐或稀释肝素封管(1000单位/毫升)的受试者[第2组,n = 91]的出血率。除了术前国际标准化比值(INR)外,两组的基线特征没有差异,术后组的术前INR高于术前组(1.29对1.21,p = 0.04)。逻辑回归分析结果显示,第1组发生复合出血事件的可能性是第2组的11.9倍,p = 0.04。与低剂量肝素(1000单位/毫升)或枸橼酸盐封管溶液相比,浓缩肝素(5000单位/毫升)与隧道式导管置入后主要出血并发症增加相关,p = 0.02。鉴于本研究的结果,有必要进行一项随机对照试验,比较常用抗凝封管溶液的安全性和有效性。