• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为弱势成年母亲提供居家支持。

Home-based support for disadvantaged adult mothers.

作者信息

Bennett C, Macdonald G M, Dennis J, Coren E, Patterson J, Astin M, Abbott J

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD003759. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003759.pub2.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD003759.pub2
PMID:17636732
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Babies born to socio-economically disadvantaged mothers are at higher risk of a range of problems in infancy. Home visiting programs are thought to improve outcomes, both for mothers and children, largely through advice and support.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of home visiting programmes for women who have recently given birth and who are socially or economically disadvantaged.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the following electronic databases: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 3, 2006); MEDLINE (1966 to March 2006); EMBASE (1980 to 2006 week 12); CINAHL (1982 to March week 4 2006); PsycINFO (1872 to March week 4 2006); ASSIA (1987 to March 2006); LILACS (1982 to March 2006); and Sociological Abstracts(1963 to March 2006). We searched grey literature using ZETOC (1993 to March 2006); Dissertation Abstracts International (late 1960s to 2006); and SIGLE (1980 to March 2006). We also undertook communication with published authors about ongoing or unpublished research.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Included studies were randomised controlled trials investigating the efficacy of home visiting directed at disadvantaged adult mothers.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers (EC and JP or CB) independently assessed titles and abstracts identified in the search for eligibility. Data were extracted and entered into RevMan (EC, JP and CB), synthesised and presented in both written and graphical form (forest plots). Outcomes included in this review were established at the protocol stage by an international steering group. The review does not report on all outcomes reported in included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 11 studies with 4751 participants in this review. Data show no statistically significant differences for those receiving home visiting, either for maternal outcomes (maternal depression, anxiety, the stress associated with parenting, parenting skills, child abuse risk or potential or breastfeeding) or child outcomes (preventive health care visits, psychosocial health, language development, behaviour problems or accidental injuries. Evidence about uptake of immunisations is mixed, and the data on child maltreatment difficult to interpret.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests that for disadvantaged adult women and their children, there is currently no evidence to support the adoption of home visiting as a means of improving maternal psychosocial health, parenting or outcomes for children. For reasons discussed in the review, this does not amount to a conclusion that home visiting programmes are ineffective, but indicates a need to think carefully about the problems that home visiting might influence, and improvements in the conduct of outcome studies in this area.

摘要

背景

社会经济地位不利的母亲所生的婴儿在婴儿期出现一系列问题的风险更高。家庭访视计划被认为主要通过提供建议和支持来改善母亲和孩子的结局。

目的

评估针对近期分娩且社会或经济地位不利的妇女的家庭访视计划的有效性。

检索策略

我们检索了以下电子数据库:Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(2006年第3期);MEDLINE(1966年至2006年3月);EMBASE(1980年至2006年第12周);CINAHL(1982年至2006年第4周);PsycINFO(1872年至2006年第4周);ASSIA(1987年至2006年3月);LILACS(1982年至2006年3月);以及社会学文摘(1963年至2006年3月)。我们使用ZETOC(1993年至2006年3月)、国际学位论文摘要(20世纪60年代末至2006年)和SIGLE(1980年至2006年3月)检索了灰色文献。我们还与已发表文章的作者就正在进行或未发表的研究进行了交流。

入选标准

纳入的研究为随机对照试验,调查针对处境不利的成年母亲的家庭访视的疗效。

数据收集与分析

两名综述作者(EC和JP或CB)独立评估检索中识别出的标题和摘要以确定是否符合纳入标准。提取数据并录入RevMan(EC、JP和CB),进行综合并以书面和图表形式(森林图)呈现。本综述纳入的结局在方案制定阶段由一个国际指导小组确定。本综述未报告纳入研究中报告的所有结局。

主要结果

本综述纳入了11项研究,共4751名参与者。数据显示,接受家庭访视的人在母亲结局(母亲抑郁焦虑、育儿压力、育儿技能、虐待儿童风险或可能性或母乳喂养)或儿童结局(预防性保健就诊、心理社会健康、语言发育行为问题或意外伤害)方面无统计学显著差异。关于免疫接种的接受情况的证据不一难以解释。

作者结论

本综述表明,对于处境不利的成年女性及其子女,目前没有证据支持采用家庭访视作为改善母亲心理社会健康、育儿或儿童结局的手段。出于综述中讨论的原因,这并不等同于得出家庭访视计划无效论,而是表明需要仔细考虑家庭访视可能影响的问题,并改进该领域结局研究的开展。

相似文献

1
Home-based support for disadvantaged adult mothers.为弱势成年母亲提供居家支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD003759. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003759.pub2.
2
Home-based support for disadvantaged teenage mothers.为弱势青少年母亲提供的居家支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD006723. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006723.
3
WITHDRAWN: Home-based support for disadvantaged adult mothers.撤回:为弱势成年母亲提供的居家支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;2008(1):CD003759. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003759.pub3.
4
WITHDRAWN: Home-based support for disadvantaged teenage mothers.撤回:为弱势青少年母亲提供的家庭支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;2008(1):CD006723. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006723.pub2.
5
Parent-training programmes for improving maternal psychosocial health.改善孕产妇心理社会健康的家长培训项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD002020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002020.pub2.
6
WITHDRAWN: Home-based social support for socially disadvantaged mothers.撤回:为社会处境不利的母亲提供的居家社会支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD000107. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000107.
7
Home-based social support for socially disadvantaged mothers.为社会弱势母亲提供的居家社会支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;1999(2):CD000107. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000107.
8
Antiretrovirals for reducing the risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV infection.用于降低人类免疫缺陷病毒感染母婴传播风险的抗逆转录病毒药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24(1):CD003510. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003510.pub2.
9
Parent-training programmes for improving maternal psychosocial health.改善孕产妇心理社会健康的家长培训项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(2):CD002020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002020.
10
Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding.纯母乳喂养的最佳持续时间。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(1):CD003517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003517.

引用本文的文献

1
Maternity homes and social support: A cross-sectional survey stratifying outcomes.妇产院与社会支持:一项对结果进行分层的横断面调查
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2019 May 14;32(3):348-354. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2019.1588838. eCollection 2019 Jul.
2
Embedding mental health interventions in early childhood education systems for at-risk preschoolers: an evidence to policy realist review.将心理健康干预措施纳入针对高危学龄前儿童的幼儿教育系统:一项基于证据的政策现实主义综述。
Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 29;3:84. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-84.
3
A pilot randomised controlled trial to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the Baby Triple P Positive Parenting Programme in mothers with postnatal depression.
一项评估“积极育儿三重P项目”对产后抑郁母亲可行性和可接受性的先导随机对照试验。
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;20(4):532-54. doi: 10.1177/1359104514531589. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
4
Child wellbeing and inequalities in rich countries.富裕国家中的儿童福祉与不平等现象。
BMJ. 2007 Nov 24;335(7629):1054-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39377.490984.80. Epub 2007 Nov 16.