用于治疗精神分裂症的锂盐。

Lithium for schizophrenia.

作者信息

Leucht S, Kissling W, McGrath J

机构信息

Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU-München, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Ismaningerstr. 22, München, GERMANY, 81675.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD003834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003834.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many people with schizophrenia do not achieve a satisfactory treatment response with ordinary antipsychotic drug treatment. In these cases, various add-on medications are used, among them lithium.

OBJECTIVES

To review the effects of lithium for the treatment of schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychoses.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's register (November 2006). This register is compiled by methodical searches of BIOSIS, CINAHL, Dissertation abstracts, EMBASE, LILACS, MEDLINE, PSYNDEX, PsycINFO, RUSSMED, Sociofile, supplemented with hand searching of relevant journals and numerous conference proceedings. We also contacted pharmaceutical companies and authors of relevant studies to identify further trials and to obtain original patient data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials comparing lithium to antipsychotics or to placebo (or no intervention), whether as sole treatment or as an adjunct to antipsychotic medication for the treatment of schizophrenia and/or schizophrenia-like psychoses.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data independently. For homogenous dichotomous data we calculated random effects, relative risk (RR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and, where appropriate, numbers needed to treat (NNT) on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD).

MAIN RESULTS

The update search in 2006 did not detect further studies that met our inclusion criteria. The review thus still includes 20 studies with a total of 611 participants. Most studies were small, of short duration and incompletely reported, but a number of authors were willing to share their data with us. Three studies comparing lithium with placebo as the sole treatment showed no difference in any of the outcomes we analysed. In eight studies comparing lithium with antipsychotic drugs as the sole treatment, more participants in the lithium group left the studies early (n=270, RR 1.8, CI 1.2 to 2.9, NNT 9, CI 5 to 33). Several of the outcomes relating to these studies suggested that lithium is less effective than antipsychotic drugs, but it was difficult to summarise the data because a variety of rating scales were used in the studies. Eleven studies examined whether the augmentation of antipsychotic drugs with lithium salts is more effective than antipsychotic drugs alone. More participants who received lithium augmentation had a clinically significant response (n=244, RR 0.8, CI 0.7 to 0.96, NNT 8, CI 4 to 33). However, statistical significance became borderline when participants with schizoaffective disorders were excluded in a sensitivity analysis (n=120, RR 0.8, CI 0.6 to 1.0, p=0.07). Furthermore, more participants in the lithium augmentation groups left the studies early (n=320, RR 2.0 CI 1.3 to 3.1, NNT 7, CI 4 to 14), suggesting a lower acceptability of lithium augmentation compared to those on antipsychotics alone. No superior efficacy of lithium augmentation in any specific aspect of the mental state was found. While based on very little data, there were no differences between groups for adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no randomised trial-based evidence that lithium on its own is an effective treatment for people with schizophrenia. The evidence available on augmentation of antipsychotics with lithium is inconclusive, but does justify further, large, simple and well-designed trials. These should concentrate on two target groups: 1) people with no affective symptoms, so that trialists can determine whether lithium has an effect on the core symptoms of schizophrenia, 2) people with schizoaffective disorders for whom lithium is widely used in clinical practice, although there is no evidence to support this use.

摘要

背景

许多精神分裂症患者采用普通抗精神病药物治疗时,治疗反应并不理想。在这些情况下,会使用各种附加药物,其中包括锂盐。

目的

综述锂盐治疗精神分裂症及精神分裂症样精神病的效果。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane精神分裂症研究组的登记册(2006年11月)。该登记册通过对BIOSIS、CINAHL、学位论文摘要、EMBASE、LILACS、MEDLINE、PSYNDEX、PsycINFO、RUSSMED、Sociofile进行系统检索编制而成,并辅以对相关期刊和众多会议论文集的手工检索。我们还联系了制药公司和相关研究的作者,以确定更多试验并获取原始患者数据。

入选标准

我们纳入了所有比较锂盐与抗精神病药物或安慰剂(或无干预)的随机对照试验,无论其作为单一治疗还是作为抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症和/或精神分裂症样精神病的辅助治疗。

数据收集与分析

我们独立提取数据。对于同质二分数据,我们计算随机效应、相对风险(RR)、95%置信区间(CI),并在适当情况下计算意向性分析的治疗所需人数(NNT)。对于连续数据,我们计算加权平均差(WMD)。

主要结果

2006年的更新检索未发现符合我们纳入标准的进一步研究。因此,本综述仍包括20项研究,共611名参与者。大多数研究规模小、持续时间短且报告不完整,但一些作者愿意与我们分享他们的数据。三项将锂盐作为单一治疗与安慰剂比较的研究在我们分析的任何结果中均未显示出差异。八项将锂盐作为单一治疗与抗精神病药物比较的研究中,锂盐组有更多参与者提前退出研究(n = 270,RR 1.8,CI 1.2至2.9,NNT 9,CI 5至33)。与这些研究相关的几个结果表明,锂盐的效果不如抗精神病药物,但由于研究中使用了多种评定量表,因此难以汇总数据。十一项研究考察了锂盐增强抗精神病药物治疗是否比单独使用抗精神病药物更有效。接受锂盐增强治疗的参与者中有更多人有临床显著反应(n = 244,RR 0.8,CI 0.7至0.96,NNT 8,CI 4至33)。然而,在敏感性分析中排除分裂情感性障碍患者后,统计学显著性接近临界值(n = 120,RR 0.8,CI 0.6至1.0,p = 0.07)。此外,锂盐增强治疗组有更多参与者提前退出研究(n = 320,RR 2.0,CI 1.3至3.1,NNT 7,CI 4至14),这表明与单独使用抗精神病药物相比,锂盐增强治疗的可接受性较低。未发现锂盐增强治疗在精神状态的任何特定方面有更优疗效。虽然基于的数据非常少,但两组在不良事件方面没有差异。

作者结论

没有基于随机试验的证据表明锂盐单独使用对精神分裂症患者是一种有效的治疗方法。关于锂盐增强抗精神病药物治疗的现有证据尚无定论,但确实有理由进行进一步的、大规模、简单且设计良好的试验。这些试验应集中在两个目标群体:1)无情感症状的患者,以便试验者能够确定锂盐是否对精神分裂症的核心症状有影响;2)分裂情感性障碍患者,锂盐在临床实践中广泛用于此类患者,尽管尚无证据支持这种用法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索