用于治疗精神分裂症的卡马西平。
Carbamazepine for schizophrenia.
作者信息
Leucht S, Kissling W, McGrath J, White P
机构信息
Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU-München, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Ismaningerstr. 22, München, Germany, 81675.
出版信息
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD001258. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001258.pub2.
BACKGROUND
Many people with schizophrenia do not achieve a satisfactory treatment response with just antipsychotic drug treatment and various adjunct medications are used to promote additional response. The antiepileptic carbamazepine is one such drug.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the effects of carbamazepine and its derivatives for the treatment of schizophrenia and related psychoses.
SEARCH STRATEGY
For the original version we searched Biological Abstracts (1980-2001), The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2001), The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register of Trials (December 2001), EMBASE (1980-2001), MEDLINE (1966-2001), PsycLIT (1886-2001) and PSYNDEX (1974-2001). For the current update we searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register of Trials in March 2005 and in December 2006. We also inspected references of all identified studies for further trials and contacted relevant pharmaceutical companies and authors for additional data.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included all randomised controlled trials comparing carbamazepine or compounds of the carbamazepine family to placebo or no intervention, whether as sole treatment or as an adjunct to antipsychotic medication for the treatment of schizophrenia and/or schizoaffective psychoses.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We extracted data independently. For homogenous dichotomous data we calculated random effects, relative risk (RR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and, where appropriate, numbers needed to treat (NNT) on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD).
MAIN RESULTS
The update search did not reveal any further studies that met our inclusion criteria. The number of included studies therefore remains at ten with the number of participants randomised still 258. One study comparing carbamazepine with placebo as the sole treatment for schizophrenia was abandoned early due to high relapse rate with 26 out of 31 participants relapsing by three months. No effect of carbamazepine was evident with no difference in relapse between the two groups (1 RCT n=31, RR 4.1 CI 0.8 to 1.5). Another study compared carbamazepine with antipsychotics as the sole treatment for schizophrenia. No differences in terms of mental state were found when comparing 50% reduction in BPRS scores (1 RCT n=38, RR 1.2 CI 0.8 to 1.9). A favourable effect for carbamazepine was found when more people who received the antipsychotic (perphenazine) had parkinsonism (1 RCT n=38, RR 0.03 CI 0.00 to 0.04, NNH 1 CI 0.9 to 1.4). Eight studies compared adjunctive carbamazepine versus adjunctive placebo. Adding carbamazepine to antipsychotic treatment was as acceptable as adding placebo with no difference between the numbers leaving the study early from each group (8 RCTs n=182, RR 0.5 CI 0.2 to 1.4). Carbamazepine augmentation was superior compared with antipsychotics alone in terms of overall global improvement, but participant numbers were low (2RCTs n=38, RR 0.6 CI 0.4 to 0.9, NNT 2 CI 1 to 5). There were no differences for the mental state outcome of 50% reduction in BPRS scores (6 RCTs n=147, RR 0.9 CI 0.7 to 1.1). Less people in the carbamazepine augmentation group had movement disorders than those taking haloperidol alone (1 RCT n=20, RR 0.4 CI 0.1 to 1.0). No data were available for the effects of carbamazepine on subgroups of people with schizophrenia and aggressive behaviour, negative symptoms or EEG abnormalities or with schizoaffective disorder.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on currently available randomised trial-derived evidence, carbamazepine cannot be recommended for routine clinical use for treatment or augmentation of antipsychotic treatment of schizophrenia. At present large, simple well-designed and reported trials are justified especially if focusing on those with violent episodes and people with schizoaffective disorders or those with both schizophrenia and EEG abnormalities.
背景
许多精神分裂症患者仅使用抗精神病药物治疗无法获得满意的治疗反应,因此使用各种辅助药物来促进进一步的反应。抗癫痫药物卡马西平就是其中一种。
目的
评估卡马西平及其衍生物治疗精神分裂症及相关精神病性障碍的效果。
检索策略
对于原始版本,我们检索了《生物学文摘》(1980 - 2001年)、《考克兰图书馆》(2001年第3期)、考克兰精神分裂症研究组试验注册库(2001年12月)、《荷兰医学文摘数据库》(1980 - 2001年)、《医学索引》(1966 - 2001年)、《心理学文摘》(1886 - 2001年)和《德国心理学文摘数据库》(1974 - 2001年)。对于当前更新内容,我们检索了考克兰精神分裂症研究组试验注册库2005年3月和2006年12月的数据。我们还查阅了所有纳入研究的参考文献以寻找更多试验,并联系了相关制药公司和作者以获取更多数据。
入选标准
我们纳入了所有将卡马西平或卡马西平家族化合物与安慰剂或无干预措施进行比较的随机对照试验,无论其作为单一治疗还是作为抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症和/或分裂情感性精神病的辅助治疗。
数据收集与分析
我们独立提取数据。对于同质二分数据,我们基于意向性分析计算随机效应、相对危险度(RR)、95%置信区间(CI),并在适当情况下计算治疗所需人数(NNT)。对于连续性数据,我们计算加权均数差(WMD)。
主要结果
更新检索未发现符合我们纳入标准的进一步研究。因此纳入研究数量仍为10项,随机分组的参与者数量仍为258名。一项将卡马西平与安慰剂作为精神分裂症单一治疗方法进行比较的研究因复发率高而提前终止,31名参与者中有26名在三个月内复发。两组复发率无差异,未显示卡马西平有明显效果(1项随机对照试验,n = 31,RR = 4.1,CI = 0.8至1.5)。另一项研究将卡马西平与抗精神病药物作为精神分裂症单一治疗方法进行比较。比较简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)评分降低50%时,未发现精神状态有差异(1项随机对照试验,n = 38,RR = 1.2,CI = 0.8至1.9)。当更多接受抗精神病药物(奋乃静)治疗的人出现帕金森症时,发现卡马西平有有利作用(1项随机对照试验,n = 38,RR = 0.03,CI = 0.00至0.04,NNH = 1,CI = 0.9至1.4)。八项研究比较了卡马西平辅助治疗与安慰剂辅助治疗。在抗精神病药物治疗中加用卡马西平与加用安慰剂的可接受性相同,两组提前退出研究的人数无差异(8项随机对照试验,n = 182,RR = 0.5,CI = 0.2至1.4)。在总体综合改善方面,卡马西平增效治疗优于单独使用抗精神病药物,但参与者数量较少(2项随机对照试验,n = 38,RR = 0.6,CI = 0.4至0.9,NNT = 2,CI = 1至5)。比较BPRS评分降低50%时的精神状态结果无差异(6项随机对照试验,n = 147,RR = 0.9,CI = 0.7至1.1)。与单独服用氟哌啶醇相比,卡马西平增效治疗组出现运动障碍的人数较少(1项随机对照试验,n = 20,RR = 0.4,CI = 0.1至1.0)。关于卡马西平对精神分裂症伴有攻击行为、阴性症状或脑电图异常的亚组患者或分裂情感性障碍患者的影响,尚无数据。
作者结论
基于目前可得的随机试验证据,不推荐将卡马西平常规用于精神分裂症的治疗或抗精神病药物治疗的增效。目前有必要开展大型、设计良好且报告规范的简单试验,尤其是针对有暴力发作的患者、分裂情感性障碍患者或同时患有精神分裂症和脑电图异常的患者。