Sibley L M, Sipe T A, Brown C M, Diallo M M, McNatt K, Habarta N
Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Lillian Carter Center for International Nursing, Emory University, 1520 Clifton Road, Room 428, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD005460. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005460.pub2.
Between the 1970s and 1990s, the World Health Organization promoted traditional birth attendant (TBA) training as one strategy to reduce maternal and neonatal mortality. To date, evidence in support of TBA training remains limited and conflicting.
To assess effects of TBA training on health behaviours and pregnancy outcomes.
We searched the Trials Registers of the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group and Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group (EPOC) (June 2006); electronic databases representing fields of education, social, and health sciences (inception to June 2006); the internet; and contacted experts.
Published and unpublished randomized controlled trials (RCT), controlled before/after and interrupted time series studies comparing trained and untrained TBAs or women cared for/living in areas served by TBAs.
Three authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data.
Four studies, involving over 2000 TBAs and nearly 27,000 women, are included. One cluster-randomized trial found significantly lower rates in the intervention group regarding stillbirths (adjusted OR 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 0.83, P < 0.001), perinatal death rate (adjusted OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.83, P < 0.001) and neonatal death rate (adjusted OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.82, P < 0.001). Maternal death rate was lower but not significant (adjusted OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.22, P = 0.24) while referral rates were significantly higher (adjusted OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.90, P < 0.001). A controlled before/after study among women who were referred to a health service found perinatal deaths decreased in both intervention and control groups with no significant difference between groups (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.76, P = 0.95). Similarly, the mean number of monthly referrals did not differ between groups (P = 0.321). One RCT found a significant difference in advice about introduction of complementary foods (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.10 to 3.90, P = 0.02) but no significant difference for immediate feeding of colostrum (OR 1.37, 95% CI 0.62 to 3.03, P = 0.44). Another RCT found no significant differences in frequency of postpartum haemorrhage (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.17, P = 0.60) among women cared for by trained versus TBAs.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The potential of TBA training to reduce peri-neonatal mortality is promising when combined with improved health services. However, the number of studies meeting the inclusion criteria is insufficient to provide the evidence base needed to establish training effectiveness.
在20世纪70年代至90年代期间,世界卫生组织将培训传统接生员作为降低孕产妇和新生儿死亡率的一项策略加以推广。迄今为止,支持培训传统接生员的证据仍然有限且相互矛盾。
评估培训传统接生员对健康行为和妊娠结局的影响。
我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩小组及Cochrane有效实践与护理组织小组(EPOC)的试验注册库(2006年6月);代表教育、社会和健康科学领域的电子数据库(建库至2006年6月);互联网;并联系了专家。
已发表和未发表的随机对照试验(RCT)、前后对照试验以及中断时间序列研究,比较接受培训和未接受培训的传统接生员,或比较由传统接生员护理/居住在传统接生员服务地区的妇女。
三位作者独立评估研究质量并提取数据。
纳入了四项研究,涉及2000多名传统接生员和近27000名妇女。一项整群随机试验发现,干预组的死产率(调整后的比值比[OR]为0.69,95%置信区间[CI]为0.57至0.83,P<0.001)、围产儿死亡率(调整后的OR为0.70,95%CI为0.59至0.83,P<0.001)和新生儿死亡率(调整后的OR为0.71,95%CI为0.61至0.82,P<0.001)显著较低。孕产妇死亡率较低但不显著(调整后的OR为0.74,95%CI为0.45至1.22,P=0.24),而转诊率显著较高(调整后的OR为1.50,95%CI为1.18至1.90,P<0.001)。一项针对转诊至卫生服务机构的妇女的前后对照研究发现,干预组和对照组的围产儿死亡均有所减少,两组之间无显著差异(OR为1.02,95%CI为0.59至1.76,P=0.95)。同样,两组之间每月转诊的平均次数无差异(P=0.321)。一项随机对照试验发现,在关于添加辅食的建议方面存在显著差异(OR为2.07,95%CI为1.10至3.90,P=0.02),但在初乳即时喂养方面无显著差异(OR为1.37,95%CI为0.62至3.03,P=0.44)。另一项随机对照试验发现,接受培训的传统接生员护理的妇女与未接受培训的传统接生员护理的妇女相比,产后出血频率无显著差异(OR为0.94,95%CI为0.76至1.17,P=0.60)。
当与改善卫生服务相结合时,培训传统接生员降低围产期新生儿死亡率的潜力是有前景的。然而,符合纳入标准的研究数量不足以提供确定培训效果所需的证据基础。