Manterola C, Astudillo P, Losada H, Pineda V, Sanhueza A, Vial M
Universidad de la Frontera, Surgery, Manual Montt 112, Officina 402, Temuco, IX Region, Chile, 54-D.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD005660. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005660.pub2.
For decades, analgesia for patients with acute abdominal pain was withheld until a definitive diagnosis was established for fear of masking the symptoms, changing physical findings or ultimately delaying diagnosis and treatment of a surgical condition. This non-evidence-based approach has been challenged by recent studies demonstrating that the use of analgesia in the initial evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain leads to significant pain reduction without affecting diagnostic accuracy. However, early administration of analgesia to such patients can greatly reduce their pain and does not interfere with a diagnosis, which may even be facilitated due to the severity of physical symptoms being reduced.
To determine if the currently available evidence supports the use of opioid analgesia in patient management with acute abdominal pain; and to assess changes in a patient comfort while awaiting definitive diagnosis and final treatment decisions.
Trials were identified by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, issue 4, 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to 2006) and EMBASE (1980 to 2006). Randomized controlled trial filter for MEDLINE and EMBASE search. Trials will also be identified by "related articles". The searches were not limited by language or publication status.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that include adult patients with acute abdominal pain, without gender restriction, comparing any opioid analgesia regime to no analgesia administered prior to any intervention regardless of outcomes.
Two authors looked independently at the titles and abstracts of reports. Potentially relevant studies selected by at least one reviewer were retrieved in full text versions for potential inclusion. Allocation concealment was important to avoid bias and was graded using the Cochrane approach. The data from studies included was reviewed qualitatively and quantitatively using the Cochrane Collaborations methodology and statistical software RevMan Analysis 1.0.5. In the case of homogeneity or non- worrying heterogeneity, a random effects model was used. Sensitivity analysis was performed based on quality assessment.
Six studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Improvement with use of opioid analgesia was verified in variables patient comfort, reduction of pain, changes in physical examination.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The review provide some evidence to support the notion that the use of opioid analgesics in patients with acute abdominal pain is helpful in terms of patient comfort and does not retard decisions to treat.
几十年来,急性腹痛患者的镇痛措施一直被推迟,直到确诊为止,因为担心掩盖症状、改变体格检查结果或最终延误外科疾病的诊断和治疗。这种缺乏循证依据的方法受到了近期研究的挑战,这些研究表明,在急性腹痛患者的初始评估中使用镇痛药物可显著减轻疼痛,且不影响诊断准确性。然而,对这类患者早期给予镇痛药物可极大地减轻其疼痛,且不干扰诊断,甚至由于躯体症状的严重程度减轻,诊断可能会更容易。
确定现有证据是否支持在急性腹痛患者的管理中使用阿片类镇痛药;并评估患者在等待确诊和最终治疗决策期间舒适度的变化。
通过检索Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(《Cochrane图书馆》,2006年第4期)、MEDLINE(1966年至2006年)和EMBASE(1980年至2006年)来识别试验。对MEDLINE和EMBASE检索使用随机对照试验过滤器。试验也将通过“相关文章”来识别。检索不受语言或发表状态的限制。
随机对照试验(RCT),纳入成年急性腹痛患者,无性别限制,比较任何阿片类镇痛方案与在任何干预之前不给予镇痛治疗的情况,无论结果如何。
两位作者独立查看报告的标题和摘要。至少一位评审员选择的潜在相关研究被检索全文版本以供可能纳入。分配隐藏对于避免偏倚很重要,并使用Cochrane方法进行分级。使用Cochrane协作网方法和统计软件RevMan Analysis 1.0.5对纳入研究的数据进行定性和定量审查。在存在同质性或非令人担忧的异质性的情况下,使用随机效应模型。基于质量评估进行敏感性分析。
六项研究符合纳入标准。在患者舒适度、疼痛减轻、体格检查变化等变量中,证实使用阿片类镇痛药有改善。
该综述提供了一些证据支持以下观点,即在急性腹痛患者中使用阿片类镇痛药在患者舒适度方面是有帮助的,且不延迟治疗决策。