Harrer J U, Hornen S, Valaikiene J, Oertel M F, Klötzsch C, Schlachetzki F
Department of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Ultraschall Med. 2007 Aug;28(4):380-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-927115. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
Conventional transcranial ultrasound perfusion imaging (UPI) depends on bolus injection and is limited to triggered imaging. To improve our set-ups, we compared two imaging modalities with two different frame rates (FR) and mechanical indices (MI), intending to approach conditions more similar to real time imaging in order to increase parameter precision.
Fifteen healthy volunteers were investigated twice with UPI after i. v. administration of 1 ml of SonoVue(R): first, with a high MI (1.6) and a low FR (0.67 Hz)) and second, with a low MI (1.0) and a high FR (5 Hz). Apart from visual analysis, time-intensity curves were calculated from three regions of interest (ROI) and peak intensity (PI), time to PI (TP), and area-under-the-curve (AUC) were compared between the two imaging modalities.
Visually, only scarce contrast enhancement was observed in 10/15 probands, and penetration depth was markedly lower at the low MI/high FR setting, while the high MI/low FR setting lead to very intense enhancement in 13/15 individuals. Signal-to-noise-ratio was higher at the low MI/high FR setting. TP was not significantly different between the two set-ups (p > 0.05). PI and AUC were significantly lower at the low MI/high FR setting (p</= 0.001), and both parameters correlated well in corresponding ROIs (p < 0.05 or < 0.01 in 8/9 ROIs). Parameter images reflected the differences of these two semi-quantitative parameters.
In patients with excellent bone windows, the new set-up seems to offer highly precise kinetic analysis with an excellent signal-to-noise ratio. In the majority of patients, however, conventional transcranial UPI is limited to high MI and a resulting rather low FR to allow sufficient penetration depth and contrast enhancement.
传统经颅超声灌注成像(UPI)依赖团注注射,且仅限于触发成像。为改进我们的设置,我们比较了两种具有不同帧率(FR)和机械指数(MI)的成像模式,旨在接近更类似于实时成像的条件,以提高参数精度。
15名健康志愿者在静脉注射1ml声诺维后接受两次UPI检查:第一次,采用高MI(1.6)和低FR(0.67Hz);第二次,采用低MI(1.0)和高FR(5Hz)。除视觉分析外,从三个感兴趣区域(ROI)计算时间-强度曲线,并比较两种成像模式之间的峰值强度(PI)、达峰时间(TP)和曲线下面积(AUC)。
视觉上,15名受试者中有10名仅观察到少量对比增强,低MI/高FR设置下的穿透深度明显较低,而高MI/低FR设置导致15名受试者中有13名出现非常强烈的增强。低MI/高FR设置下的信噪比更高。两种设置之间的TP无显著差异(p>0.05)。低MI/高FR设置下的PI和AUC显著较低(p≤0.001),且两个参数在相应ROI中具有良好的相关性(9个ROI中有8个p<0.05或<0.01)。参数图像反映了这两个半定量参数的差异。
在骨窗良好的患者中,新设置似乎能提供具有出色信噪比的高精度动力学分析。然而,在大多数患者中,传统经颅UPI限于高MI以及由此产生的较低FR,以实现足够的穿透深度和对比增强。