East James E, Saunders Brian P, Burling David, Boone Darren, Halligan Steve, Taylor Stuart A
Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, United Kingdom.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Nov;102(11):2529-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01429.x. Epub 2007 Jul 19.
Colonoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosis of mucosal disease, but has a recognized "miss rate" for polyps probably because some lesions lie in areas of the colonic surface that do not enter the field of view. Using CT colonography (CTC) simulation this pilot study aimed to determine how much colonic surface is visualized with a standard, modern optical colonoscope (field of view 140 degrees ) with or without the addition of a retrograde viewing auxiliary imaging device (RVAID; 135 degrees ) and of a wide-angle (170 degrees ) colonoscope.
Supine CTC datasets for 20 patients were reviewed with customized CTC software that calculated the percentage of colonic surface seen and number and area of nonvisualized "missed" areas at a unidirectional three-dimensional (3D) endoluminal flythrough, approximating the view obtained at optical colonoscopy. The field of view could be varied from 0-180 degrees . The combination of a colonoscope with RVAID was simulated by an additional flythrough facing the rectum.
Mean colonic surface area was 2,743 +/- 759 cm2. Percentage colonic surface visualized at simulated optical colonoscopy with a 90 degrees , 140 degrees , and 170 degrees field of view was 68.0 +/- 5.2%, 86.6 +/- 3.3%, and 92.2 +/- 3.3%, respectively, P < 0.001. Simulation of a 140 degrees colonoscope with an RVAID resulted in almost complete surface visualization, 98.7 +/- 0.5%, with total missed area reduced 10-fold compared with a 170 degrees colonoscope, P < 0.001.
CTC simulated 140 degrees optical colonoscopy visualizes over 85% of the colonic surface. 170 degrees colonoscopy provides a modest reduction in missed surface and the simulated addition of RVAIDs appears beneficial.
结肠镜检查是诊断黏膜疾病的金标准,但对于息肉存在公认的“漏诊率”,这可能是因为一些病变位于结肠表面未进入视野的区域。本前瞻性研究利用CT结肠成像(CTC)模拟,旨在确定使用标准的现代光学结肠镜(视野为140度),无论是否添加逆行观察辅助成像设备(RVAID;135度)以及广角(170度)结肠镜时,能观察到多少结肠表面。
使用定制的CTC软件对20例患者的仰卧位CTC数据集进行回顾,该软件计算在单向三维(3D)腔内飞行浏览时观察到的结肠表面百分比以及未观察到的“漏诊”区域的数量和面积,近似于光学结肠镜检查时获得的视野。视野范围可在0至180度之间变化。通过面向直肠的额外飞行浏览模拟结肠镜与RVAID的组合。
结肠表面积均值为2743±759平方厘米。在模拟光学结肠镜检查中,视野为90度、140度和170度时观察到的结肠表面百分比分别为68.0±5.2%、86.6±3.3%和92.2±3.3%,P<0.001。模拟140度结肠镜并添加RVAID可使表面观察几乎完整,为98.7±0.5%,与170度结肠镜相比,总漏诊面积减少了10倍,P<0.001。
CTC模拟的140度光学结肠镜可观察到超过85%的结肠表面。170度结肠镜检查可适度减少表面漏诊,模拟添加RVAID似乎有益。