Avsaroglu H, van der Sar A S, van Lith H A, van Zutphen L F M, Hellebrekers L J
Central Laboratory Animal Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lab Anim. 2007 Jul;41(3):337-44. doi: 10.1258/002367707781282811.
Differences in response to analgesic and anaesthetic drugs can partly be attributed to variations in the genetic background of experimental animals. This study was carried out to determine differences in the response of inbred rat strains to a selection of analgesics and drugs used in anaesthetic protocols. A cross between the most contrasting strains can then be phenotyped in future studies in order to localize quantitative trait loci (QTLs) involved in analgesic/anaesthetic drug sensitivity. Eight inbred strains (n = 6 rats/strain) were selected for the study: the pigmented ACI, BN and COP strains and the albino F344, LEW, SHR, WAG and WKY strains. Each rat was injected intravenously with two analgesics (buprenorphine 0.05 mg/kg and nalbuphine 1 mg/kg) and three drugs used in anaesthetic protocols (propofol 25 mg/kg, medetomidine 50 microg/kg and ketamine 10 mg/kg), respectively, using a crossover design. Analgesic responses were assessed using an analgesiometric procedure. The sleep time of the rat and, where applicable, the interval between injection and loss of righting reflex were used to determine the anaesthetic response. Six out of eight strains responded significantly different from each other to the analgesic effect of buprenorphine with the ACI strain as hyper-responder. The tail withdrawal latency at 55 degrees C of the F344 and WKY rats using buprenorphine was not significantly different from baseline tail withdrawal latencies. In this study, all strains were non-responsive to the analgesic effects of nalbuphine. The response to all three drugs used in anaesthetic protocols differed significantly among the strains. The F344 and BN strains were relatively resistant to the sedative effects of medetomidine. Use of ketamine was abandoned in the ACI and BN strains when the first two animals of both strains died soon after induction. With all three drugs the sleep time of albino rats was significantly longer compared with that of the pigmented ones. We conclude that the results from this study can be used in future studies where QTLs for the sensitivity to anaesthetic/analgesic drugs are localized.
对镇痛和麻醉药物反应的差异部分可归因于实验动物遗传背景的差异。本研究旨在确定近交系大鼠品系对一系列镇痛药物和麻醉方案中使用的药物的反应差异。然后,在未来的研究中,可以对差异最大的品系之间的杂交后代进行表型分析,以定位与镇痛/麻醉药物敏感性相关的数量性状基因座(QTL)。本研究选择了八个近交系(每个品系n = 6只大鼠):有色的ACI、BN和COP品系以及白化的F344、LEW、SHR、WAG和WKY品系。采用交叉设计,分别给每只大鼠静脉注射两种镇痛药物(丁丙诺啡0.05 mg/kg和纳布啡1 mg/kg)和三种麻醉方案中使用的药物(丙泊酚25 mg/kg、美托咪定50 μg/kg和氯胺酮10 mg/kg)。使用镇痛测量程序评估镇痛反应。大鼠的睡眠时间以及(如适用)注射与翻正反射消失之间的间隔时间用于确定麻醉反应。八个品系中有六个品系对丁丙诺啡的镇痛效果反应差异显著,ACI品系为高反应者。使用丁丙诺啡时,F344和WKY大鼠在55℃时的甩尾潜伏期与基线甩尾潜伏期无显著差异。在本研究中,所有品系对纳布啡的镇痛效果均无反应。各品系对麻醉方案中使用的所有三种药物的反应差异显著。F344和BN品系对美托咪定的镇静作用相对耐药。当ACI和BN品系的前两只动物在诱导后不久死亡时,放弃了在这两个品系中使用氯胺酮。使用所有三种药物时,白化大鼠的睡眠时间明显长于有色大鼠。我们得出结论,本研究的结果可用于未来定位麻醉/镇痛药物敏感性QTL的研究。