Suppr超能文献

使用间歇性静态收缩评估背部肌肉能力。第一部分——疲劳肌电图指标的有效性和可靠性。

The assessment of back muscle capacity using intermittent static contractions. Part I - Validity and reliability of electromyographic indices of fatigue.

作者信息

Larivière Christian, Gagnon Denis, Gravel Denis, Bertrand Arsenault A

机构信息

Occupational Health and Safety Research Institute Robert-Sauvé, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 3C2.

出版信息

J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008 Dec;18(6):1006-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.03.012. Epub 2007 Jul 20.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Back muscle capacity is impaired in chronic low back pain patients but no motivation-free test exists to measure it. The aims of this study were to assess the reliability and criterion validity of electromyographic indices of muscle fatigue during an intermittent absolute endurance test.

METHODS

Healthy subjects (44 males and 29 females; age: 20-55 yrs) performed three maximal voluntary contractions (MVC) and a fatigue test while standing in a static dynamometer. Surface EMG signals were collected from four pairs of back muscles (multifidus at the L5 level, iliocostalis lumborum at L3, and longissimus at L1 and T10). The fatigue test, assessing absolute endurance (90-Nm torque), consisted in performing an intermittent extension task to exhaustion. Strength was defined as the peak MVC whereas our endurance criterion was defined as the time to reach exhaustion (Tend) during the fatigue test. From the first five min (females) or ten min (males) of EMG data, frequency and time-frequency domain analyses were applied to compute various spectral indices of muscle fatigue.

RESULTS

The EMG indices were more reliable when computed from the time-frequency domain than when computed from the frequency domain, but showed comparable correlation results (criterion validity) with Tend and Strength. Some EMG indices reached moderate to good correlation (range: 0.64-0.69) with Tend, lower correlations (range: 0.39-0.55) with Strength, and good to excellent between-day test-retest reliability results (intra-class correlation range: 0.75-0.83). The quantification of the spectral content more locally in different frequency bands of the power spectrum was less valid and reliable than the indices computed from the entire power spectrum. Differences observed among muscles were interpreted in light of specific neuromuscular activation levels that were observed during the endurance test. These findings supported the use of an intermittent and time-limited (5-10min) absolute endurance test, that is a practical way to assess the back capacity of chronic low back pain subjects, to assess absolute endurance as well as strength with the use of electromyographic indices of muscle fatigue.

摘要

引言

慢性下腰痛患者的背部肌肉能力受损,但尚无无需受试者主动配合的测试方法来测量该能力。本研究的目的是评估间歇性绝对耐力测试期间肌肉疲劳的肌电图指标的可靠性和标准效度。

方法

健康受试者(44名男性和29名女性;年龄:20 - 55岁)在静态测力计上站立时进行三次最大自主收缩(MVC)和一次疲劳测试。从四对背部肌肉(L5水平的多裂肌、L3水平的腰髂肋肌以及L1和T10水平的最长肌)采集表面肌电信号。疲劳测试评估绝对耐力(90牛米扭矩),包括执行间歇性伸展任务直至力竭。力量定义为最大自主收缩峰值,而我们的耐力标准定义为疲劳测试中达到力竭的时间(Tend)。从肌电数据的前五分钟(女性)或十分钟(男性)开始,应用频率和时频域分析来计算各种肌肉疲劳的频谱指标。

结果

与从频域计算相比,从时频域计算的肌电指标更可靠,但与Tend和力量显示出相当的相关性结果(标准效度)。一些肌电指标与Tend达到中度至良好的相关性(范围:0.64 - 0.69),与力量的相关性较低(范围:0.39 - 0.55),且日间测试 - 重测可靠性结果良好至优秀(组内相关范围:0.75 - 0.83)。在功率谱的不同频带中更局部地量化频谱内容,其效度和可靠性低于从整个功率谱计算的指标。根据耐力测试期间观察到的特定神经肌肉激活水平来解释肌肉之间观察到的差异。这些发现支持使用间歇性且限时(5 - 10分钟)的绝对耐力测试,这是评估慢性下腰痛受试者背部能力的一种实用方法,可通过使用肌肉疲劳的肌电图指标来评估绝对耐力和力量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验