Larivière Christian, Gravel Denis, Gagnon Denis, Gardiner Phillip, Bertrand Arsenault A, Gaudreault Nathaly
Occupational Health and Safety Research Institute Robert-Sauvé, Montreal, Que., Canada H3A 3C2.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2006 Nov;21(9):893-904. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.05.004. Epub 2006 Jun 27.
Gender difference in the fatigability of muscles can be attributed to muscle mass (or strength) and associated level of vascular occlusion, substrate utilization, muscle composition, and neuromuscular activation patterns. The purpose of this study was to assess the role of neuromuscular activation patterns to explain gender differences in back muscle fatigability during intermittent isometric tasks.
Sixteen males and 15 females performed maximal voluntary contractions (Strength) and a fatigue test to exhaustion (fatigue criterion=time to exhaustion), while standing in a static dynamometer measuring L5/S1 extension moment. The fatigue test consisted of repetitions of an 8-s cycle (1.5 s ramp to reach 40% of maximal voluntary contraction +5s plateau at 40% of maximal voluntary contraction +1.5s rest). Surface electromyography signals were collected bilaterally from 4 back muscles (multifidus at the L5 level, iliocostalis lumborum at L3, and longissimus at L1 and T10).
Males were stronger (P<0.05) than females (316, SD 82>196, SD 25 Nm) but showed significantly shorter time-to-exhaustion values (7.1, SD 5.2<13.0, SD 6.1 min.), the latter result being corroborated by electromyographic indices of fatigue. However, the gender effect on time to exhaustion disappeared when accounting for Strength, thus supporting the muscle mass hypothesis. Among the various electromyographic indices computed to assess neuromuscular activation patterns, the amount of alternating activity between homolateral and between contralateral muscles showed a gender effect (females>males).
These results support the muscle mass hypothesis as well as the neuromuscular activation hypothesis to explain gender differences in back muscle fatigability.
肌肉疲劳性的性别差异可归因于肌肉质量(或力量)以及相关的血管闭塞水平、底物利用、肌肉组成和神经肌肉激活模式。本研究的目的是评估神经肌肉激活模式在解释间歇性等长任务期间背部肌肉疲劳性性别差异中的作用。
16名男性和15名女性在静态测力计上站立,测量L5/S1伸展力矩,进行最大自主收缩(力量测试)以及疲劳至 exhaustion 的测试(疲劳标准 = 疲劳时间)。疲劳测试由8秒周期的重复动作组成(1.5秒上升至最大自主收缩的40% + 在最大自主收缩的40%保持5秒平台期 + 1.5秒休息)。从4块背部肌肉(L5水平的多裂肌、L3的腰髂肋肌以及L1和T10的最长肌)双侧采集表面肌电图信号。
男性比女性更强壮(P<0.05)(316,标准差82 > 196,标准差25 Nm),但疲劳至 exhaustion 的时间显著更短(7.1,标准差5.2 < 13.0,标准差6.1分钟),后者的结果得到了疲劳肌电图指标的证实。然而,当考虑力量因素时,性别对疲劳至 exhaustion 时间的影响消失,从而支持了肌肉质量假说。在计算的用于评估神经肌肉激活模式的各种肌电图指标中,同侧和对侧肌肉之间的交替活动量显示出性别效应(女性>男性)。
这些结果支持肌肉质量假说以及神经肌肉激活假说,以解释背部肌肉疲劳性的性别差异。