Suppr超能文献

急性失代偿性心力衰竭住院患者中,单纯静脉利尿剂与利尿剂加肠外血管活性治疗的安全性:一项使用急性失代偿性心力衰竭国家注册(ADHERE)数据库的倾向评分和工具变量分析。

The safety of intravenous diuretics alone versus diuretics plus parenteral vasoactive therapies in hospitalized patients with acutely decompensated heart failure: a propensity score and instrumental variable analysis using the Acutely Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE) database.

作者信息

Costanzo Maria Rosa, Johannes R S, Pine Michael, Gupta Vikas, Saltzberg Mitchell, Hay Joel, Yancy Clyde W, Fonarow Gregg C

机构信息

Midwest Heart Foundation, Lombard, IL, USA.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2007 Aug;154(2):267-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.04.033.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The treatment of acute decompensated heart failure remains problematic and most often requires parenteral therapies. Significant concerns have been expressed regarding risks and benefits of individual therapies, especially nesiritide (NES), but few studies have compared the relative safety of varied intravenous therapies on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We compared the safety of intravenous diuretics (DIUR), inotropes (INO), and vasodilators (nitroglycerin [NTG]) on mortality rates and worsening renal function in 99,963 inpatients with acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Patients with a diagnosis of ADHF within 48 hours were grouped by intended primary treatment (intravenous agents administered during the first 2 hours of intravenous therapy). Treatments studied were (a) intended monotherapy (DIUR), (b) intended combination therapy (DIUR + NES, NTG, or INO), and (c) sequential therapy (intended DIUR monotherapy followed by a second agent administered >2 hours later). Propensity-matched cohorts and instrumental analysis were used to adjust for differences among patients in treatment groups.

RESULTS

Intended DIUR monotherapy yielded an unadjusted inpatient mortality rate of 3.2%. After intended DIUR monotherapy, inpatient mortality was not higher for sequential use of NES than for sequential use of NTG (3.4% vs 6.2%, P = .0028). In all regimens, INOs were associated with higher inpatient mortality than were diuretics or vasodilators used alone. The rate of worsening renal function was higher with combination of diuretic-based regimens with NES (risk ratio 1.44, P < .0001) or NTG (RR 1.2, P = .012) compared with diuretics alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with alternative intravenous regimens, administration of vasodilators, including NES, was not associated with increased inpatient mortality. A large randomized controlled clinical trial is being planned to prospectively address the question of risks and benefits of NES for ADHF.

摘要

背景

急性失代偿性心力衰竭的治疗仍然存在问题,且大多需要肠外治疗。人们对个别治疗方法的风险和益处,尤其是奈西立肽(NES),表示了极大关注,但很少有研究比较不同静脉治疗方法对临床结局的相对安全性。

方法

我们比较了静脉利尿剂(DIUR)、正性肌力药(INO)和血管扩张剂(硝酸甘油[NTG])对99963例急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)住院患者死亡率和肾功能恶化的安全性。在48小时内诊断为ADHF的患者按预期的主要治疗方法分组(静脉治疗的前2小时内给予的静脉药物)。研究的治疗方法包括:(a)预期单一疗法(DIUR),(b)预期联合疗法(DIUR + NES、NTG或INO),以及(c)序贯疗法(预期DIUR单一疗法,随后在2小时后给予第二种药物)。使用倾向匹配队列和工具分析来调整治疗组患者之间的差异。

结果

预期DIUR单一疗法的未调整住院死亡率为3.2%。在预期DIUR单一疗法之后,序贯使用NES的住院死亡率并不高于序贯使用NTG的住院死亡率(3.4%对6.2%,P = 0.0028)。在所有治疗方案中,与单独使用利尿剂或血管扩张剂相比,使用正性肌力药的住院死亡率更高。与单独使用利尿剂相比,基于利尿剂疗法与NES(风险比1.44,P < 0.0001)或NTG联合使用(RR 1.2,P = 0.012)时,肾功能恶化的发生率更高。

结论

与其他静脉治疗方案相比,使用包括NES在内的血管扩张剂与住院死亡率增加无关。正在计划进行一项大型随机对照临床试验,以前瞻性地解决NES治疗ADHF的风险和益处问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验