Suppr超能文献

患有主动脉缩窄和室间隔缺损的婴儿的最佳治疗方法是什么?

What is the optimal management of infants with coarctation and ventricular septal defect?

作者信息

Kanter Kirk R, Mahle William T, Kogon Brian E, Kirshbom Paul M

机构信息

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Aug;84(2):612-8; discussion 618. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.03.021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The management of patients with aortic coarctation and ventricular septal defect (VSD) remains controversial. We reviewed our experience with coarctation and VSD from 2002 to 2006.

METHODS

Three approaches were used to manage 36 consecutive infants with coarctation and VSD. Group I had staged coarctation repair with or without pulmonary artery banding, followed by VSD closure with two separate operations (two-stage, n = 11); Group II had coarctation repair and VSD closure on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with circulatory arrest or regional perfusion during coarctation repair (one-stage, one-incision, n = 10); Group III had coarctation repair without CPB through a thoracotomy, followed by VSD closure during the same operation (one-stage, two-incisions, n = 15).

RESULTS

No patients died. One recoarctation occurred in group II. Group II had significantly longer times for CPB (135.6 +/- 31.8 versus 94.3 +/- 29.8 minutes for group I; 67.6 +/- 16.7 minutes for group III; p < 0.001) and combined regional perfusion/circulatory arrest (30.0 +/- 17.0 versus 5.3 +/- 11.9 minutes for group I, 1.1 +/- 4.4 minutes for group III, p < 0.0001). Group III compared with group II had significantly shorter lengths of stay in the intensive care unit (119.5 +/- 64.8 versus 220.8 +/- 198.8 hours, p = 0.04) and hospital (8.4 +/- 3.8 versus 24.4 +/- 24.4 days, p = 0.01). Combining values for the two hospitalizations in the group I infants, lengths of stay in the intensive care unit (178.8 +/- 70.8 hours) and hospital (20.5 +/- 11.6 days) were intermediate between groups II and III.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary repair of infants with coarctation and VSD using a one-stage approach through separate incisions affords excellent clinical results. One can avoid prolonged aortic cross-clamping, CPB, and circulatory arrest/regional perfusion. Compared with the group undergoing combined coarctation and VSD repair simultaneously by sternotomy, total lengths of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital were significantly decreased.

摘要

背景

主动脉缩窄合并室间隔缺损(VSD)患者的治疗仍存在争议。我们回顾了2002年至2006年期间主动脉缩窄合并VSD的治疗经验。

方法

采用三种方法治疗36例连续性主动脉缩窄合并VSD的婴儿。第一组采用分期主动脉缩窄修复术,可选择或不进行肺动脉环扎,随后通过两次独立手术关闭VSD(两阶段,n = 11);第二组在体外循环(CPB)下进行主动脉缩窄修复和VSD关闭,在主动脉缩窄修复期间采用循环阻断或区域灌注(一阶段,单切口,n = 10);第三组通过开胸术在非CPB下进行主动脉缩窄修复,随后在同一手术中关闭VSD(一阶段,双切口,n = 15)。

结果

无患者死亡。第二组发生1例再狭窄。第二组的CPB时间明显更长(第一组为135.6 +/- 31.8分钟,第二组为94.3 +/- 29.8分钟;第三组为67.6 +/- 16.7分钟;p < 0.001),以及联合区域灌注/循环阻断时间(第一组为30.0 +/- 17.0分钟,第二组为5.3 +/- 11.9分钟,第三组为1.1 +/- 4.4分钟,p < 0.0001)。与第二组相比,第三组在重症监护病房的住院时间明显更短(119.5 +/- 64.8小时对220.8 +/- 198.8小时,p = 0.04),在医院的住院时间也更短(8.4 +/- 3.8天对24.4 +/- 24.4天,p = 0.01)。将第一组婴儿两次住院的时间值相加,其在重症监护病房的住院时间(178.8 +/- 70.8小时)和医院的住院时间(20.5 +/- 11.6天)介于第二组和第三组之间。

结论

采用通过单独切口的一阶段方法对主动脉缩窄合并VSD的婴儿进行一期修复可获得良好的临床效果。可以避免长时间的主动脉交叉阻断、CPB以及循环阻断/区域灌注。与通过胸骨切开术同时进行主动脉缩窄和VSD联合修复的组相比,在重症监护病房和医院的总住院时间明显缩短。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验