Walters Henry L, Ionan Constantine E, Thomas Ronald L, Delius Ralph E
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu. 2008:22-30. doi: 10.1053/j.pcsu.2007.12.006.
The results of single-stage and two-stage repair of coarctation of the aorta (CoA) with ventricular septal defect (VSD) have improved, but the optimal treatment strategy remains controversial. This article emphasizes the technical details for performing the single-stage repair of CoA with VSD and compares the results of this technique with the two-stage approach. A retrospective analysis of 46 patients who underwent completed surgical repair of CoA with VSD at Children's Hospital of Michigan, either using the single-stage (N=23) or the two-stage (N=23) techniques, was performed. The postoperative complications, hospital mortality, freedom from cardiac re-interventions, and actuarial survival were the same in both groups. The advantages of single-stage over two-stage repair include an earlier age at completion of repair, fewer operations, and fewer incisions. The one disadvantage of a single-stage repair was the increased need for delayed sternal closure compared with the two-stage approach, but this disadvantage has been neutralized in the recent era.
主动脉缩窄(CoA)合并室间隔缺损(VSD)的一期和二期修复结果已有改善,但最佳治疗策略仍存在争议。本文重点介绍CoA合并VSD一期修复的技术细节,并将该技术的结果与二期修复方法进行比较。对密歇根儿童医院46例接受CoA合并VSD完全手术修复的患者进行了回顾性分析,其中23例采用一期修复技术,23例采用二期修复技术。两组患者的术后并发症、住院死亡率、无需再次心脏干预以及实际生存率均相同。一期修复相对于二期修复的优势包括修复完成时年龄更小、手术次数更少以及切口更少。一期修复的一个缺点是与二期修复相比,延迟胸骨闭合的需求增加,但在最近这个时期,这一缺点已被抵消。