• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实体器官移植受者巨细胞病毒感染管理中的预防成本。

Cost of prophylaxis in the management of cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplant recipients.

作者信息

Oppenheimer Federico, Gonzalez-Molina Miguel, Rubio Marta

机构信息

Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2007 Jul-Aug;21(4):441-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2007.00612.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1399-0012.2007.00612.x
PMID:17645702
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited economic data exist on the use of valganciclovir for the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. We compared the economics of sequential i.v. and oral ganciclovir prophylaxis vs. oral valganciclovir prophylaxis alone in high-risk (D+/R-) SOT patients.

METHODS

A cost-minimization analysis was performed from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System comparing the cost of sequential ganciclovir prophylaxis (induction with i.v. ganciclovir 10 mg/kg daily for 14 d followed by oral ganciclovir 1 g t.i.d. for 3 months) vs. oral valganciclovir prophylaxis (900 mg once daily for 100 d). Resource utilization data for both regimens were obtained from the literature and from clinical records of 83 patients in nine Spanish hospitals. Results were expressed as average cost per patient treated.

RESULTS

The average cost per patient treated with sequential ganciclovir or valganciclovir prophylaxis was euro3715.51 and euro3295.90, respectively. The higher cost of ganciclovir therapy was due to concomitant administration of anti-CMV immunoglobulin (euro313.73), drug administration costs (euro401.45), catheter culture tests (euro13.64) and adverse events associated with catheter use (euro3.30). Following a sensitivity analysis, taking into account dose and duration of drug, concomitant medications and adverse events, costs for valganciclovir and sequential therapy were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Valganciclovir prophylaxis is as economical as sequential ganciclovir prophylaxis in high-risk D+/R- SOT patients. In addition, the once-daily dosing regimen of valganciclovir is more convenient, and avoids the complications associated with catheter use.

摘要

背景

关于缬更昔洛韦用于预防实体器官移植(SOT)受者巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染和疾病的经济数据有限。我们比较了在高危(D+/R-)SOT患者中序贯静脉和口服更昔洛韦预防与单独口服缬更昔洛韦预防的经济学情况。

方法

从西班牙国家卫生系统的角度进行成本最小化分析,比较序贯更昔洛韦预防(诱导期每日静脉注射更昔洛韦10mg/kg,共14天,随后口服更昔洛韦1g,每日3次,持续3个月)与口服缬更昔洛韦预防(每日900mg,共100天)的成本。两种方案的资源利用数据来自文献和西班牙九家医院83例患者的临床记录。结果以每位接受治疗患者的平均成本表示。

结果

序贯更昔洛韦或缬更昔洛韦预防治疗的每位患者平均成本分别为3715.51欧元和3295.90欧元。更昔洛韦治疗成本较高是由于同时使用抗CMV免疫球蛋白(313.73欧元)、药物给药成本(401.45欧元)、导管培养检测(13.64欧元)以及与导管使用相关的不良事件(3.30欧元)。经过敏感性分析,考虑到药物剂量和持续时间、同时使用的药物以及不良事件,缬更昔洛韦和序贯治疗的成本相似。

结论

在高危D+/R- SOT患者中,缬更昔洛韦预防与序贯更昔洛韦预防在经济方面相当。此外,缬更昔洛韦每日一次的给药方案更方便,且避免了与导管使用相关的并发症。

相似文献

1
Cost of prophylaxis in the management of cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplant recipients.实体器官移植受者巨细胞病毒感染管理中的预防成本。
Clin Transplant. 2007 Jul-Aug;21(4):441-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2007.00612.x.
2
Valganciclovir as treatment for cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients.缬更昔洛韦用于实体器官移植受者巨细胞病毒病的治疗。
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jan 1;46(1):20-7. doi: 10.1086/523590.
3
Valganciclovir Dosing for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Pediatric Solid-organ Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Pharmacokinetic Study.缬更昔洛韦用于小儿实体器官移植受者巨细胞病毒预防的剂量:一项前瞻性药代动力学研究。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017 Aug;36(8):745-750. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001595.
4
Efficacy and safety of valganciclovir vs. oral ganciclovir for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients.缬更昔洛韦与口服更昔洛韦预防实体器官移植受者巨细胞病毒病的疗效和安全性比较
Am J Transplant. 2004 Apr;4(4):611-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00382.x.
5
Costs and outcomes of prolonged cytomegalovirus prophylaxis to cover the enhanced immunosuppression phase following lung transplantation.延长巨细胞病毒预防时间以覆盖肺移植后强化免疫抑制阶段的成本与结果
Chest. 1999 Nov;116(5):1265-72. doi: 10.1378/chest.116.5.1265.
6
Does valganciclovir hydrochloride (valcyte) provide effective prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus infection in liver transplant recipients?盐酸缬更昔洛韦(万赛维)对肝移植受者的巨细胞病毒感染有有效的预防作用吗?
Transplant Proc. 2005 Sep;37(7):3182-6. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.07.032.
7
Prolonged prophylaxis with valganciclovir is cost effective in reducing posttransplant cytomegalovirus disease within the United States.在美国,更长期的缬更昔洛韦预防治疗可有效降低移植后巨细胞病毒病的发生。
Transplantation. 2010 Dec 27;90(12):1420-6. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ff500d.
8
Cost-effectiveness model of cytomegalovirus management strategies in renal transplantation. Comparing valaciclovir prophylaxis with current practice.肾移植中巨细胞病毒管理策略的成本效益模型。将伐昔洛韦预防与当前实践进行比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Sep;18(3):239-51. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200018030-00004.
9
Valganciclovir versus valacyclovir prophylaxis for prevention of cytomegalovirus: an economic perspective.缬更昔洛韦与伐昔洛韦预防巨细胞病毒感染:经济学视角
Transpl Infect Dis. 2015 Jun;17(3):334-41. doi: 10.1111/tid.12383. Epub 2015 May 26.
10
Increased incidence of cytomegalovirus infection in high-risk liver transplant recipients receiving valganciclovir prophylaxis versus ganciclovir prophylaxis.接受缬更昔洛韦预防治疗的高危肝移植受者与接受更昔洛韦预防治疗的高危肝移植受者相比,巨细胞病毒感染发生率增加。
Liver Transpl. 2009 Aug;15(8):963-7. doi: 10.1002/lt.21769.

引用本文的文献

1
Valganciclovir in the treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis in HIV-infected patients.缬更昔洛韦治疗HIV感染患者的巨细胞病毒性视网膜炎
Clin Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar 4;4:111-9. doi: 10.2147/opth.s3248.