Suppr超能文献

实体器官移植受者巨细胞病毒感染管理中的预防成本。

Cost of prophylaxis in the management of cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplant recipients.

作者信息

Oppenheimer Federico, Gonzalez-Molina Miguel, Rubio Marta

机构信息

Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2007 Jul-Aug;21(4):441-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2007.00612.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited economic data exist on the use of valganciclovir for the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. We compared the economics of sequential i.v. and oral ganciclovir prophylaxis vs. oral valganciclovir prophylaxis alone in high-risk (D+/R-) SOT patients.

METHODS

A cost-minimization analysis was performed from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System comparing the cost of sequential ganciclovir prophylaxis (induction with i.v. ganciclovir 10 mg/kg daily for 14 d followed by oral ganciclovir 1 g t.i.d. for 3 months) vs. oral valganciclovir prophylaxis (900 mg once daily for 100 d). Resource utilization data for both regimens were obtained from the literature and from clinical records of 83 patients in nine Spanish hospitals. Results were expressed as average cost per patient treated.

RESULTS

The average cost per patient treated with sequential ganciclovir or valganciclovir prophylaxis was euro3715.51 and euro3295.90, respectively. The higher cost of ganciclovir therapy was due to concomitant administration of anti-CMV immunoglobulin (euro313.73), drug administration costs (euro401.45), catheter culture tests (euro13.64) and adverse events associated with catheter use (euro3.30). Following a sensitivity analysis, taking into account dose and duration of drug, concomitant medications and adverse events, costs for valganciclovir and sequential therapy were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Valganciclovir prophylaxis is as economical as sequential ganciclovir prophylaxis in high-risk D+/R- SOT patients. In addition, the once-daily dosing regimen of valganciclovir is more convenient, and avoids the complications associated with catheter use.

摘要

背景

关于缬更昔洛韦用于预防实体器官移植(SOT)受者巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染和疾病的经济数据有限。我们比较了在高危(D+/R-)SOT患者中序贯静脉和口服更昔洛韦预防与单独口服缬更昔洛韦预防的经济学情况。

方法

从西班牙国家卫生系统的角度进行成本最小化分析,比较序贯更昔洛韦预防(诱导期每日静脉注射更昔洛韦10mg/kg,共14天,随后口服更昔洛韦1g,每日3次,持续3个月)与口服缬更昔洛韦预防(每日900mg,共100天)的成本。两种方案的资源利用数据来自文献和西班牙九家医院83例患者的临床记录。结果以每位接受治疗患者的平均成本表示。

结果

序贯更昔洛韦或缬更昔洛韦预防治疗的每位患者平均成本分别为3715.51欧元和3295.90欧元。更昔洛韦治疗成本较高是由于同时使用抗CMV免疫球蛋白(313.73欧元)、药物给药成本(401.45欧元)、导管培养检测(13.64欧元)以及与导管使用相关的不良事件(3.30欧元)。经过敏感性分析,考虑到药物剂量和持续时间、同时使用的药物以及不良事件,缬更昔洛韦和序贯治疗的成本相似。

结论

在高危D+/R- SOT患者中,缬更昔洛韦预防与序贯更昔洛韦预防在经济方面相当。此外,缬更昔洛韦每日一次的给药方案更方便,且避免了与导管使用相关的并发症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验