Suppr超能文献

[胰腺癌胰周动静脉侵犯的CT诊断标准评估]

[Evaluation of CT diagnostic criteria for peri-pancreatic artery and vein invasion in pancreatic carcinoma].

作者信息

Li Hui, Zhou Kang-Rong, Jin Da-Yong, Lou Wen-Hui

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, First Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200080, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2007 Feb;29(2):147-50.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

OBJECTIVE; To evaluate the clinical value of different CT diagnostic criteria for peripancreatic artery and vein invasion in pancreatic carcinoma through comparison with the findings on surgical exploration.

METHODS

Of 72 patients of having suspected pancreatic carcinoma were examined by multiplane spiral CT. Among 43 confirmed by surgical pathology; 15 underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy; 28 were found to have unresectable tumors. The peri-pancreatic major vessels including the superior mesenteric artery, celiac artery, hepatic artery, superior mesenteric vein and portal vein were explored carefully during surgical exploration.

RESULTS

The criteria for peri-pancreatic artery invasion was the presence of one of the following signs: artery embeded in tumor, or more than half of the artery circumference involved by tumor with wall irregularity or stenosis. The sensitivity of the above described criteria was 75.0% (12/16). If the criteria of tumor involvement exceeding half of the vessel circumference were adhered to, the sensitivity was 87.5% (14/16), which was high than the former, but the specificity was lower than that of the former one (90.2% versus 95.1%). The criteria for peri-pancreatic vein invasion was presence of any of the following signs: vein obliteration, more than half of the vein circumference involved by tumor, vein wall irregularity, vein stenosis, tear-drop sign of superior mesenteric artery. The sensitivity of the above described criteria was 92.9% (39/42), higher than that of the criteria that more than half of the vessel circumference was involved by the tumor (69.0%, 29/42), but the specificity of both criteria was the same (97.4%, 37/38).

CONCLUSION

For assessing peri-pancreatic artery and vein invasion, using the combination of different CT diagnostic criteria has higher accuracy than when using only criteria of more than half of vessel circumference involved by tumor.

摘要

未标注

目的;通过与手术探查结果对比,评估不同CT诊断标准对胰腺癌胰周动静脉侵犯的临床价值。

方法

72例疑似胰腺癌患者接受多平面螺旋CT检查。其中43例经手术病理确诊;15例行胰十二指肠切除术;28例发现肿瘤无法切除。手术探查时仔细探查包括肠系膜上动脉、腹腔干动脉、肝动脉、肠系膜上静脉和门静脉在内的胰周主要血管。

结果

胰周动脉侵犯的标准为出现以下征象之一:动脉被肿瘤包埋,或肿瘤累及动脉周径一半以上且伴有管壁不规则或狭窄。上述标准的敏感度为75.0%(12/16)。若采用肿瘤累及血管周径超过一半的标准,敏感度为87.5%(14/16),高于前者,但特异度低于前者(90.2%对95.1%)。胰周静脉侵犯的标准为出现以下任何征象:静脉闭塞、肿瘤累及静脉周径一半以上、静脉壁不规则、静脉狭窄、肠系膜上动脉泪滴征。上述标准的敏感度为92.9%(39/42),高于肿瘤累及血管周径一半以上的标准(69.0%,29/42),但两种标准的特异度相同(97.4%,37/38)。

结论

对于评估胰周动静脉侵犯,联合使用不同CT诊断标准比仅使用肿瘤累及血管周径一半以上的标准具有更高的准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验