Parratte S, Madougou S, Villaba M, Stein A, Rochwerger A, Curvale G
Service d'orthopédie du Professeur Curvale, Hôpital de la Conception, 147, Boulevard Baille, 13385 Marseille Cedex 5.
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007 Jun;93(4):373-80. doi: 10.1016/s0035-1040(07)90279-2.
Knee arthrodesis is sometimes the only alternative to amputation in patients with an infected knee prosthesis or in major bone damage with loss of the extensor system. We hypothesized that arthrodesis with a double mono-bar external fixators would be a valid technical solution enabling simple fixation sufficiently rigid to control infection. The main objective of our study was to assess outcome with this technique in terms of fusion. The secondary objective was to check remission of the infection at last follow-up for the infection cases.
Mean follow-up in this retrospective analysis of 18 knee arthroplasties in 17 patients was 85 months. Mean patient age was 65 years. All patients presented destruction of the extensor system associated with infection on a total knee arthroplasty (n=14) or joint destruction (n=4). The first operative stage involved insertion of a temporary external fixator using a lateral bar to align the limb. The infected knee prosthesis was then removed or a spacer was inserted. After avivement of the bone surfaces, compression was applied with an external fixator using an anterior bar. Early weight bearing was encouraged. The lateral fixator was removed at 45 days and the anterior fixator at bone healing.
First-intention fusion was achieved in 16 of the 18 knees at mean five months (range 3-8 months). Fusion was achieved in one case after surgical revision using a bone autograft. Nonunion persisted in the other patient. Mean time to removal of the anterior fixator was 7.5 months (range 6-12 months). Remission of infection was noted at last follow-up in all patients with infection.
This technique provides effective treatment for infected knee prostheses or major joint destruction with loss of the extensor mechanism. Joint fusion limits function but is a better solution than above knee amputation. The rigid fixation achieved with two single-bar fixators positioned perpendicularly enables rapid weight bearing, a capital element for these often bedridden elderly patients with multiple co-morbidities. The essential element for fusion is a solid fixation. The use of external fixators also avoids implanting material in septic tissues. Associated with medical treatment for the infection we have been able to achieve complete remission of infection in all patients who underwent arthrodesis for an infected knee arthroplasty.
对于膝关节假体感染或伸肌系统严重受损且伴有主要骨质破坏的患者,膝关节融合术有时是截肢的唯一替代方案。我们假设使用双单杆外固定架进行关节融合术是一种有效的技术解决方案,能够实现简单固定且具有足够的刚性以控制感染。本研究的主要目的是评估该技术在融合方面的效果。次要目的是检查感染病例在最后一次随访时感染是否缓解。
对17例患者的18例膝关节置换术进行回顾性分析,平均随访时间为85个月。患者平均年龄为65岁。所有患者均表现为全膝关节置换术(n = 14)或关节破坏(n = 4)相关的伸肌系统破坏及感染。第一手术阶段包括使用外侧杆插入临时外固定架以矫正肢体对线。然后取出感染的膝关节假体或插入间隔物。在骨面清创后,使用前侧杆通过外固定架施加压缩力。鼓励早期负重。45天时拆除外侧固定架,骨愈合时拆除前侧固定架。
18例膝关节中有16例在平均5个月(范围3 - 8个月)时实现一期融合。1例在采用自体骨移植进行手术翻修后实现融合。另一例患者持续不愈合。前侧固定架的平均拆除时间为7.5个月(范围6 - 12个月)。所有感染患者在最后一次随访时感染均得到缓解。
该技术为感染的膝关节假体或伴有伸肌机制丧失的严重关节破坏提供了有效的治疗方法。关节融合虽会限制功能,但比膝上截肢是更好的解决方案。通过垂直放置的两个单杆固定架实现的刚性固定能够使患者快速负重,这对于这些常因多种合并症而卧床的老年患者至关重要。融合的关键要素是牢固固定。使用外固定架还避免了在感染组织中植入材料。结合针对感染的药物治疗,我们已能够使所有因感染性膝关节置换术接受关节融合术的患者实现感染完全缓解。