Waples Robin S, Adams Peter B, Bohnsack James, Taylor Barbara L
Northwest Fisheries Science Center, 2725 Montlake Boulevard East, Seattle, WA 98112, USA.
Conserv Biol. 2007 Aug;21(4):964-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00730.x.
Under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA), a species can be listed if it is at risk "in all or a significant portion of its range," but the ESA provides no guidance on how to interpret this key phrase. We propose a simple test to determine whether the areas of a species' range in which it is currently at risk amount to a significant portion: If the species were to become extirpated from these areas, at that point would the entire species be at risk? If so, then these areas represent a significant portion of the species' range. By establishing the species itself as the point of reference for determining significance, this test directs attention to biological risk factors and avoids difficulties inherent in subjective evaluations of importance to humans. For broadly distributed species this framework could provide ESA protection due to cumulative risks before the entire species met the criteria to be considered threatened or endangered. This framework also allows a somewhat broader concept of range to include major components of diversity necessary for long-term persistence. The concept of a historical template (i.e., conditions under which the species was known to be viable) is important in providing a fixed reference point for evaluating viability. Empirical examples illustrate how these concepts have been applied in recent ESA listing determinations. Most ESA-listed units of Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) can be divided into multiple strata that differ in terms of ecology, geology, or life-history traits of the component populations. The goal of ESA recovery planning is to restore viable populations in enough strata that the listed unit as a whole is no longer threatened or endangered in all or a significant portion of its range. In a recent review of Pacific herring (Clupea pallasii) in Puget Sound, current status (some populations increasing and others declining) was evaluated in the context of the historical template, and it was concluded that current patterns of distribution and abundance do not depart substantially from what would be expected at any point in time under natural conditions in a large metapopulation. The Canadian lynx (Lynx canadensis) is ESA listed in the contiguous United States, where it occurs in four geographic areas. Populations in one region, the Northern Rockies/Cascades, have always been the most important for long-term persistence of the species in the United States. Because the other regions never contained more than limited amounts of good-quality lynx habitat, those areas are not considered to represent a significant portion of the species' range.
根据美国《濒危物种法》(ESA),如果一个物种“在其全部或大部分分布范围内”处于危险之中,就可以将其列入名录,但该法案并未就如何解释这一关键短语提供指导。我们提出了一个简单的测试方法,以确定一个物种当前处于危险中的分布区域是否占其分布范围的很大一部分:如果该物种从这些区域灭绝,那么整个物种是否会处于危险之中?如果是,那么这些区域就代表了该物种分布范围的很大一部分。通过将物种本身作为确定重要性的参考点,这个测试将注意力引向生物风险因素,避免了在对人类重要性进行主观评估时固有的困难。对于分布广泛的物种,这个框架可以在整个物种符合被视为受威胁或濒危的标准之前,基于累积风险提供《濒危物种法》的保护。这个框架还允许一个更宽泛的分布范围概念,将长期存续所需的多样性主要组成部分包括在内。历史模板的概念(即已知该物种能够生存的条件)对于提供一个评估生存能力的固定参考点很重要。实证例子说明了这些概念在最近的ESA名录确定中是如何应用的。大多数被列入ESA的太平洋鲑鱼(Oncorhynchus spp.)种群可以分为多个层次,这些层次在组成种群的生态、地质或生活史特征方面存在差异。ESA恢复计划的目标是在足够多的层次中恢复有生存能力的种群,使整个被列入名录的单元在其全部或大部分分布范围内不再受到威胁或濒危。在最近对普吉特海湾太平洋鲱鱼(Clupea pallasii)的评估中,在历史模板的背景下评估了当前状况(一些种群增加而另一些种群减少),得出的结论是,当前的分布和丰度模式与在一个大集合种群的自然条件下任何时间点所预期的情况并没有实质性偏差。加拿大猞猁(Lynx canadensis)在美国本土被列入ESA名录,它分布于四个地理区域。落基山脉北部/喀斯喀特山脉这一区域的种群,对于该物种在美国的长期存续一直最为重要。因为其他区域从未拥有过超过有限数量优质的猞猁栖息地,所以那些区域不被认为代表该物种分布范围的很大一部分。