Department of Plant Science & Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Conserv Biol. 2011 Aug;25(4):716-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01689.x. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
Species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (i.e., listed species) have declined to the point that the probability of their extinction is high. The decline of these species, however, may manifest itself in different ways, including reductions in geographic range, number of populations, or overall abundance. Understanding the pattern of decline can help managers assess extinction probability and define recovery objectives. Although quantitative data on changes in geographic range, number of populations, and abundance usually do not exist for listed species, more often qualitative data can be obtained. We used qualitative data in recovery plans for federally listed species to determine whether each listed species declined in range size, number of populations, or abundance relative to historical levels. We calculated the proportion of listed species in each state (or equivalent) that declined in each of those ways. Nearly all listed species declined in abundance, and range size or number of populations declined in approximately 80% of species for which those data were available. Patterns of decline, however, differed taxonomically and geographically. Declines in range were more common among vertebrates than plants, whereas population extirpations were more common among plants. Invertebrates had high incidence of range and population declines. Narrowly distributed plants and invertebrates may be subject to acute threats that may result in population extirpations, whereas vertebrates may be affected by chronic threats that reduce the extent and size of populations. Additionally, in the eastern United States and U.S. coastal areas, where the level of land conversion is high, a greater percentage of species' ranges declined and more populations were extirpated than in other areas. Species in the Southwest, especially plants, had fewer range and population declines than other areas. Such relations may help in the selection of species' recovery criteria.
根据美国濒危物种法案(即列入名单的物种)列出的物种数量已经减少到其灭绝的可能性很高的程度。然而,这些物种的减少可能以不同的方式表现出来,包括地理范围、种群数量或总体丰度的减少。了解减少的模式可以帮助管理者评估灭绝的可能性并定义恢复目标。尽管对于列入名单的物种通常没有关于地理范围、种群数量和丰度变化的定量数据,但通常可以获得定性数据。我们使用联邦名单上的物种恢复计划中的定性数据来确定每个列入名单的物种在范围大小、种群数量或丰度方面相对于历史水平是否减少。我们计算了每个州(或同等州)中每种列出的物种在这些方面减少的比例。几乎所有列入名单的物种的丰度都减少了,大约 80%的有可用数据的物种的范围大小或种群数量减少了。然而,减少的模式在分类学和地理上有所不同。在脊椎动物中,范围的减少比植物更为常见,而在植物中,种群灭绝更为常见。无脊椎动物的范围和种群减少发生率很高。分布范围狭窄的植物和无脊椎动物可能受到急性威胁,导致种群灭绝,而脊椎动物可能受到慢性威胁,从而减少种群的范围和大小。此外,在美国东部和美国沿海地区,土地转换率很高,这些地区物种的范围减少比例更高,灭绝的种群更多,而在其他地区则较少。西南部的物种,特别是植物,比其他地区的范围和种群减少较少。这种关系可能有助于选择物种的恢复标准。