Philpott Stacy M, Bichier Peter, Rice Robert, Greenberg Russell
Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center, National Zoological Park, 3001 Connecticut Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20008, USA.
Conserv Biol. 2007 Aug;21(4):975-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00728.x.
Coffee agroecosystems are critical to the success of conservation efforts in Latin America because of their ecological and economic importance. Coffee certification programs may offer one way to protect biodiversity and maintain farmer livelihoods. Established coffee certification programs fall into three distinct, but not mutually exclusive categories: organic, fair trade, and shade. The results of previous studies demonstrate that shade certification can benefit biodiversity, but it remains unclear whether a farmer's participation in any certification program can provide both ecological and economic benefits. To assess the value of coffee certification for conservation efforts in the region, we examined economic and ecological aspects of coffee production for eight coffee cooperatives in Chiapas, Mexico, that were certified organic, certified organic and fair trade, or uncertified. We compared vegetation and ant and bird diversity in coffee farms and forests, and interviewed farmers to determine coffee yield, gross revenue from coffee production, and area in coffee production. Although there are no shade-certified farms in the study region, we used vegetation data to determine whether cooperatives would qualify for shade certification. We found no differences in vegetation characteristics, ant or bird species richness, or fraction of forest fauna in farms based on certification. Farmers with organic and organic and fair-trade certification had more land under cultivation and in some cases higher revenue than uncertified farmers. Coffee production area did not vary among farm types. No cooperative passed shade-coffee certification standards because the plantations lacked vertical stratification, yet vegetation variables for shade certification significantly correlated with ant and bird diversity. Although farmers in the Chiapas highlands with organic and/or fair-trade certification may reap some economic benefits from their certification status, their farms may not protect as much biodiversity as shade-certified farms. Working toward triple certification (organic, fair trade, and shade) at the farm level may enhance biodiversity protection, increase benefits to farmers, and lead to more successful conservation strategies in coffee-growing regions.
咖啡农业生态系统对拉丁美洲保护工作的成功至关重要,因为其具有生态和经济重要性。咖啡认证计划可能是保护生物多样性和维持农民生计的一种方式。既定的咖啡认证计划分为三个不同但并非相互排斥的类别:有机、公平贸易和遮荫。先前研究的结果表明,遮荫认证可使生物多样性受益,但农民参与任何认证计划是否能同时带来生态和经济效益仍不明确。为评估咖啡认证对该地区保护工作的价值,我们研究了墨西哥恰帕斯州八个咖啡合作社的咖啡生产的经济和生态方面,这些合作社分别获得了有机认证、有机和公平贸易认证或未认证。我们比较了咖啡农场和森林中的植被、蚂蚁和鸟类多样性,并采访了农民以确定咖啡产量、咖啡生产的总收入以及咖啡种植面积。尽管研究区域内没有获得遮荫认证的农场,但我们利用植被数据来确定合作社是否符合遮荫认证条件。我们发现,基于认证情况,农场在植被特征、蚂蚁或鸟类物种丰富度或森林动物比例方面没有差异。获得有机和有机及公平贸易认证的农民比未认证的农民有更多的耕地,在某些情况下收入也更高。咖啡种植面积在不同农场类型之间没有变化。没有合作社通过遮荫咖啡认证标准,因为种植园缺乏垂直分层,然而用于遮荫认证的植被变量与蚂蚁和鸟类多样性显著相关。尽管恰帕斯高地获得有机和/或公平贸易认证的农民可能从其认证状态中获得一些经济利益,但他们的农场可能不如获得遮荫认证的农场那样能保护那么多的生物多样性。在农场层面努力实现三重认证(有机、公平贸易和遮荫)可能会加强生物多样性保护,增加对农民的益处,并在咖啡种植地区带来更成功的保护策略。