Zikmund-Fisher Brian J, Smith Dylan M, Ubel Peter A, Fagerlin Angela
VA Health Services Research & Development Center for Practice Management and Outcomes Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):663-71. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07303824. Epub 2007 Jul 24.
In a companion article, the authors describe the Subjective Numeracy Scale (SNS), a self-assessment of numerical aptitude and preferences for numbers that correlates strongly with objective numeracy.
The objective of this article is to validate the Subjective Numeracy Scale using measures of subjects' capacity to recall and comprehend complex risk statistics and to complete utility elicitations.
The study is composed of 3 general public surveys: 2 administered via the Web and 1 by paper and pencil. Subjects. Studies 1 and 3 surveyed 862 and 1234 people, respectively, recruited via a nationwide commercial Internet survey panel. Study 2 involved 245 people who completed paper-and-pencil surveys in a Veterans Administration hospital.
The authors tested whether one's score on the SNS predicted the likelihood of correct recall and interpretation of risk information (studies 1 and 2A) or the likelihood of effectively completing a time tradeoff or person-tradeoff utility elicitation (studies 2B and 3). In Studies 1 and 2, the authors also tested whether an objective test of quantitative ability would predict performance.
In all studies, survey participants with higher SNS scores performed significantly better than other respondents. The predictive ability of the SNS approached that observed for objective numeracy.
The SNS effectively predicts both risk comprehension and completion of utility elicitations without requiring survey participants to complete time-consuming and stress-inducing mathematics tests. The authors encourage the use of the SNS in a variety of health services research contexts.
在一篇相关文章中,作者介绍了主观数字能力量表(SNS),这是一种对数字能力和数字偏好的自我评估,与客观数字能力密切相关。
本文的目的是通过衡量受试者回忆和理解复杂风险统计数据以及完成效用评估的能力来验证主观数字能力量表。
该研究由3项公众调查组成:2项通过网络进行,1项通过纸笔进行。受试者。研究1和研究3分别对通过全国性商业互联网调查小组招募的862人和1234人进行了调查。研究2涉及245名在退伍军人管理局医院完成纸笔调查的人。
作者测试了一个人在SNS上的得分是否能预测正确回忆和解释风险信息的可能性(研究1和2A),或者有效完成时间权衡或人员权衡效用评估的可能性(研究2B和3)。在研究1和2中,作者还测试了定量能力的客观测试是否能预测表现。
在所有研究中,SNS得分较高的调查参与者的表现明显优于其他受访者。SNS的预测能力接近客观数字能力的预测能力。
SNS能有效预测风险理解和效用评估的完成情况,而无需调查参与者完成耗时且会带来压力的数学测试。作者鼓励在各种卫生服务研究背景下使用SNS。