Mayer-Hamblett Nicole, Ramsey Bonnie W, Kronmal Richard A
Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105-0371, USA.
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2007 Aug 1;4(4):370-7. doi: 10.1513/pats.200703-040BR.
The growing pipeline of candidate drugs for cystic fibrosis (CF) is challenging clinical trial research. There has been a shift from evaluating drugs aimed at treating the secondary manifestations of CF to evaluating drugs targeted toward the primary prevention of chronic lung disease. As CF is an orphan disease, there is a fundamental need to assess new therapies efficiently and accurately by mechanisms that best use the number of available patients. This need can be addressed with the continued advancement and refinement of CF outcome measures. We begin by presenting an overview of the outcome measures currently used in CF clinical studies, defined and categorized in terms of one of the three main classes of endpoints: clinical efficacy measures, surrogate endpoints, and biomarkers. To move forward efficiently, clinical research in CF is dependent on the development of new outcomes able to capture biologic and clinical response to novel therapeutic approaches. We conclude with a discussion of the criteria by which all new outcome measures should be evaluated. A systematic, rigorous approach to outcome measure development is needed to provide the tools necessary for evaluating new therapies and moving drugs out of the pipeline and into the CF clinic.
囊性纤维化(CF)候选药物研发的不断推进给临床试验研究带来了挑战。研究重点已从评估旨在治疗CF继发表现的药物,转向评估针对慢性肺病一级预防的药物。由于CF是一种罕见病,因此迫切需要通过最有效利用现有患者数量的机制,高效且准确地评估新疗法。这一需求可通过CF疗效指标的持续改进来满足。我们首先概述CF临床研究中目前使用的疗效指标,并根据三个主要终点类别之一进行定义和分类:临床疗效指标、替代终点和生物标志物。为了高效推进,CF临床研究依赖于开发能够捕捉对新型治疗方法的生物学和临床反应的新指标。我们最后讨论所有新疗效指标都应依据的评估标准。需要一种系统、严谨的方法来开发疗效指标,以提供评估新疗法以及将药物从研发阶段推进到CF临床应用所需的工具。