Rowe Steven M, Accurso Frank, Clancy John P
Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-0006, USA.
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2007 Aug 1;4(4):387-98. doi: 10.1513/pats.200703-043BR.
Advances in our understanding of cystic fibrosis pathogenesis have led to strategies directed toward treatment of underlying causes of the disease rather than treatments of disease-related symptoms. To expedite evaluation of these emerging therapies, early-phase clinical trials require extension of in vivo cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)-detecting assays to multicenter trial formats, including nasal potential difference and sweat chloride measurements. Both of these techniques can be used to fulfill diagnostic criteria for the disease, and can discriminate various levels of CFTR function. Full realization of these assays in multicenter clinical trials requires identification of sources of nonbiological intra- and intersite variability, and careful attention to study design and statistical analysis of study-generated data. In this review, we discuss several issues important to the performance of these assays, including efforts to identify and address aspects that can contribute to inconsistent and/or potentially erroneous results. Adjunctive means of detecting CFTR including mRNA expression, immunocytochemical localization, and other methods are also discussed. Recommendations are presented to advance our understanding of these biomarkers and to improve their capacity to predict cystic fibrosis outcomes.
我们对囊性纤维化发病机制认识的进展,已促使人们采取针对该疾病根本病因进行治疗的策略,而非仅仅治疗与疾病相关的症状。为加速对这些新兴疗法的评估,早期临床试验需要将体内囊性纤维化跨膜传导调节因子(CFTR)检测方法扩展至多中心试验形式,包括鼻电位差和汗液氯化物测量。这两种技术均可用于满足该疾病的诊断标准,并能区分不同水平的CFTR功能。要在多中心临床试验中充分实现这些检测方法,需要识别非生物学的内部和站点间变异性来源,并密切关注研究设计以及对研究产生的数据进行统计分析。在本综述中,我们讨论了这些检测方法性能方面的几个重要问题,包括识别和解决可能导致结果不一致和/或潜在错误的因素的努力。还讨论了检测CFTR的辅助方法,包括mRNA表达、免疫细胞化学定位及其他方法。本文提出了相关建议,以增进我们对这些生物标志物的理解,并提高它们预测囊性纤维化结局的能力。