Hassen-Khodja R, Jean-Baptiste E, Haudebourg P, Declemy S, Batt M, Bouillanne P J
Department of Vascular Surgery, Saint Roch Hospital, 5 rue Pierre Dévoluy-BP 1319, 06006 Nice, France.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2007 Aug;48(4):491-5.
Endovascular repair may represent an interesting alternative to open surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). This study evaluated the feasibility and short-term results of endovascular repair of ruptured AAA at our center.
Between April 2004 and December 2005, all patients admitted to our center for a ruptured AAA were considered for endovascular repair. Patients whose hemodynamic status was too unstable to permit a preoperative CT scan and patients with an unfavorable anatomy for endovascular repair underwent open surgery. Endovascular repair consisted in emergency placement of an aorto-uni-iliac endograft associated with a crossover femoro-femoral bypass and deployment of an occluder in the contralateral common iliac artery. Follow-up postoperative CT scans were obtained 1, 6, 12 and 18 months after intervention and then annually. Data concerning diagnosis, the operative risk, treatment, and follow-up were collated prospectively in a registry and were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.
Between April 2004 and December 2005, 17 patients were admitted to our Department for a ruptured AAA. Ten patients (59 %) underwent emergency endovascular repair and were included in this study (8 men and 2 women, mean age 81 years, range 51-97). The mean duration of the operation was 167 +/- 37 min. The mean blood transfusion volume was 3 700 +/- 1 400 mL. The mean duration of hospitalization was 19 days (range: 9-60). Mortality at day 30 was 20% (2 patients): one death occurred on day 2 due to multi-organ failure in an 80-year-old patient and another death occurred on day 2 owing to myocardial infarction in an 87-year-old patient. Mean follow-up was 6 months. Late mortality occurred in 2 cases. No endoleaks were observed during follow-up.
Our initial results using endografts for the repair of ruptured AAA were satisfactory, with a feasibility of 59% and an operative mortality of 20%. Randomized studies are necessary to determine the true value of endovascular repair of ruptured AAA compared to conventional open repair.
对于破裂性腹主动脉瘤(AAA),血管内修复术可能是开放手术的一个有吸引力的替代方案。本研究评估了在我们中心进行破裂性AAA血管内修复的可行性和短期结果。
在2004年4月至2005年12月期间,所有因破裂性AAA入住我们中心的患者都被考虑进行血管内修复。血流动力学状态过于不稳定以至于无法进行术前CT扫描的患者以及血管内修复解剖结构不佳的患者接受开放手术。血管内修复包括紧急放置一个主动脉单髂内支架移植物并联合交叉股-股旁路移植术,以及在对侧髂总动脉放置封堵器。干预后1、6、12和18个月以及之后每年进行术后CT扫描随访。有关诊断、手术风险、治疗和随访的数据前瞻性地整理在一个登记册中,并在意向性治疗的基础上进行分析。
在2004年4月至2005年12月期间,17例患者因破裂性AAA入住我们科室。10例患者(59%)接受了紧急血管内修复并纳入本研究(8例男性和2例女性,平均年龄81岁,范围51 - 97岁)。平均手术时间为167±37分钟。平均输血量为3700±1400毫升。平均住院时间为19天(范围:9 - 60天)。30天死亡率为20%(2例患者):1例80岁患者因多器官功能衰竭于术后第2天死亡,另1例87岁患者因心肌梗死于术后第2天死亡。平均随访时间为6个月。2例发生晚期死亡。随访期间未观察到内漏。
我们使用内支架修复破裂性AAA的初步结果令人满意,可行性为59%,手术死亡率为20%。需要进行随机研究以确定与传统开放修复相比,破裂性AAA血管内修复的真正价值。