Rojas Ramon A, Paluga Igor, Goldfrad Caroline H, Duggan Marie T, Barnes Neil
Centro Privado de Cardiolia, Tucuman, Argentina.
J Asthma. 2007 Jul-Aug;44(6):437-41. doi: 10.1080/02770900701421930.
The objective of this study was to investigate initial maintenance treatment with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (Seretide) 50/250 microg twice daily (SFC) compared with fluticasone propionate (Flixotide) 250 microg twice daily (FP) (both via Diskus inhaler, GlaxoSmithKline, Greenford, UK) in patients with moderate persistent asthma currently only treated with inhaled short-acting beta2-agonists. A total of 362 adults and adolescents (12 to 80 years of age) were randomized to this 12-week double-blind parallel-group study. The primary endpoint was mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF). Secondary efficacy endpoints included median percentages of symptom-free and rescue-free days and nights; the percentage of patients who achieved the pre-defined criteria for well-controlled asthma over weeks 5 to 12; and the incidence of asthma exacerbations. Safety was assessed by the incidence of adverse events. Superiority of SFC over FP alone was demonstrated for the primary and each secondary endpoint. The difference in adjusted mean change from baseline in morning PEF between SFC and FP was 21 L/min (95% CI: 11, 31; p<0.001). Significantly more patients achieved well-controlled asthma during treatment with SFC (46%) compared with FP (32%) (odds ratio 1.84; 95% CI: 1.17, 2.89; p=0.008). Both treatments were safe and well-tolerated. This study demonstrates that initial maintenance treatment with SFC 50/250 mug twice daily provides superior efficacy to FP 250 microg twice daily alone in patients with moderate persistent asthma.
本研究的目的是调查沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松(舒利迭)50/250微克每日两次(SFC)与丙酸氟替卡松(辅舒酮)250微克每日两次(FP)(均通过都保吸入器给药,葛兰素史克公司,英国格林福德)对目前仅接受吸入短效β2激动剂治疗的中度持续性哮喘患者的初始维持治疗效果。总共362名成人和青少年(12至80岁)被随机分配至这项为期12周的双盲平行组研究。主要终点是早晨平均呼气峰值流速(PEF)。次要疗效终点包括无症状和无需急救的白天和夜晚的中位数百分比;在第5至第12周达到哮喘良好控制预定义标准的患者百分比;以及哮喘加重的发生率。通过不良事件的发生率评估安全性。在主要终点和每个次要终点方面,均证明SFC优于单独使用FP。SFC与FP相比,早晨PEF自基线调整后的平均变化差异为21升/分钟(95%CI:11,31;p<0.001)。与FP(32%)相比,使用SFC治疗期间达到哮喘良好控制的患者明显更多(46%)(优势比1.84;95%CI:1.17,2.89;p=0.008)。两种治疗均安全且耐受性良好。本研究表明,对于中度持续性哮喘患者,每日两次使用50/250微克SFC进行初始维持治疗比每日两次单独使用250微克FP具有更好的疗效。