Suppr超能文献

附加沙美特罗与双剂量氟替卡松治疗儿童哮喘的比较:一项双盲、随机试验(VIAPAED)。

Add-on salmeterol compared to double dose fluticasone in pediatric asthma: a double-blind, randomized trial (VIAPAED).

机构信息

Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Pediatr Pulmonol. 2009 Nov;44(11):1132-42. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21120.

Abstract

RATIONALE

In asthmatic children whose symptoms are uncontrolled on standard doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), guidelines recommend to either increase the ICS dose or to add further controller medication, e.g. a long acting ss2-agonist (LABA). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of doubling the dose of ICS (fluticasone proprionate FP 200 microg twice daily) with adding a long-acting beta-2 agonist to the ICS (SFC, salmeterol 50 microg/ FP 100 microg twice daily) in children with uncontrolled asthma.

METHODS

Children between 4 and 16 years of age were eligible for this multicenter, randomized, double blind, double dummy, parallel-group study. During a 14-day run-in phase, all children inhaled FP 100 microg b.i.d. Patients with persistent symptoms on > or =7 of 14 days were randomized to 8 weeks treatment with a Diskus(R) containing either SFC 50 microg/100 microg b.i.d. or FP 200 microg b.i.d.. The primary endpoint was the mean change in morning (a.m.) PEF from baseline. The initial statistical hypothesis of non-inferiority of SFC vs. FP was confirmed in an adaptive interim analysis, so that the study was terminated prematurely.

RESULTS

441 patients from 39 centers entered the run-in phase, and 64% of these were randomized to treatment (N = 138 to SFC and N = 145 to FP). After 8 weeks, patients on SFC had significantly better results for primary and secondary endpoints: The mean increase in morning PEF was 30.4 +/- 34.1 L/min in the SFC group and 16.7 +/- 35.8 L/min in the fluticasone group, and the mean (95% CI) improvement from baseline a.m. PEF in the ITT group was significantly larger after SFC (+8.6 L/min, CI: [1.3; infinity]). Patients in the SFC group experienced 8.7% (CI: [1.2;16.3]) more days without asthma symptoms and 8.0% (CI: [0.6;15.3]) more days without salbutamol than patients receiving FP. Good asthma control was achieved for a longer period in the SFC (3.4 +/- 2.7 weeks) group than in the FP group (2.7 +/- 2.7, P = 0.02). Both treatments were generally well tolerated. Asthma exacerbations were recorded in 3 and 6 and SAEs in 2 and 1 patients from the SFC and FP groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In children with persistent asthma inadequately controlled on low dose ICS alone, adding a long acting beta-2-agonist to ICS in a single inhaler was more effective than doubling the ICS dose. These results support recommendations of adding LABA to low-dose ICS as the preferred controller option for children older than 4 years with symptomatic asthma.

摘要

背景

对于症状无法通过标准剂量吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)控制的哮喘儿童,指南建议增加 ICS 剂量或添加其他控制药物,例如长效 ss2-激动剂(LABA)。本研究旨在比较将 ICS 剂量加倍(丙酸氟替卡松 200 微克,每日两次)与将长效β2-激动剂(沙丁胺醇 50 微克/丙酸氟替卡松 100 微克,每日两次)添加到 ICS(SFC)治疗未控制哮喘儿童的疗效和安全性。

方法

年龄在 4 至 16 岁之间的儿童有资格参加这项多中心、随机、双盲、双模拟、平行组研究。在 14 天的导入期内,所有儿童均吸入丙酸氟替卡松 100 微克,每日两次。在>或= 14 天中有> 7 天持续症状的患者随机接受 8 周的治疗,使用含有 SFC 50 微克/ 100 微克,每日两次或丙酸氟替卡松 200 微克,每日两次的 Diskus(R)。主要终点是从基线到清晨(am)PEF 的平均变化。SFC 与 FP 非劣效性的初始统计假设在适应性中期分析中得到确认,因此该研究提前终止。

结果

39 个中心的 441 名患者进入导入期,其中 64%的患者接受了治疗(SFC 组 N = 138,FP 组 N = 145)。经过 8 周治疗,SFC 组患者的主要和次要终点结果明显更好:SFC 组清晨 PEF 的平均增加量为 30.4 +/- 34.1 L/min,而氟替卡松组为 16.7 +/- 35.8 L/min,意向治疗(ITT)组从基线到清晨 PEF 的平均改善量在 SFC 后显著增加(+ 8.6 L/min,CI:[1.3;无穷大])。与接受 FP 的患者相比,SFC 组患者有 8.7%(CI:[1.2;16.3])更多天没有哮喘症状,8.0%(CI:[0.6;15.3])更多天没有沙丁胺醇。SFC(3.4 +/- 2.7 周)组的哮喘控制时间明显长于 FP 组(2.7 +/- 2.7,P = 0.02)。两种治疗方法通常都耐受良好。SFC 和 FP 组分别有 3 例和 6 例患者记录到哮喘恶化,2 例和 1 例患者出现严重不良事件。

结论

在低剂量 ICS 单独治疗无法充分控制症状的哮喘儿童中,ICS 中添加长效β2-激动剂比 ICS 剂量加倍更有效。这些结果支持在 4 岁以上有症状哮喘儿童中添加 LABA 作为低剂量 ICS 的首选控制药物的建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验