Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2009 Nov;44(11):1132-42. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21120.
In asthmatic children whose symptoms are uncontrolled on standard doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), guidelines recommend to either increase the ICS dose or to add further controller medication, e.g. a long acting ss2-agonist (LABA). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of doubling the dose of ICS (fluticasone proprionate FP 200 microg twice daily) with adding a long-acting beta-2 agonist to the ICS (SFC, salmeterol 50 microg/ FP 100 microg twice daily) in children with uncontrolled asthma.
Children between 4 and 16 years of age were eligible for this multicenter, randomized, double blind, double dummy, parallel-group study. During a 14-day run-in phase, all children inhaled FP 100 microg b.i.d. Patients with persistent symptoms on > or =7 of 14 days were randomized to 8 weeks treatment with a Diskus(R) containing either SFC 50 microg/100 microg b.i.d. or FP 200 microg b.i.d.. The primary endpoint was the mean change in morning (a.m.) PEF from baseline. The initial statistical hypothesis of non-inferiority of SFC vs. FP was confirmed in an adaptive interim analysis, so that the study was terminated prematurely.
441 patients from 39 centers entered the run-in phase, and 64% of these were randomized to treatment (N = 138 to SFC and N = 145 to FP). After 8 weeks, patients on SFC had significantly better results for primary and secondary endpoints: The mean increase in morning PEF was 30.4 +/- 34.1 L/min in the SFC group and 16.7 +/- 35.8 L/min in the fluticasone group, and the mean (95% CI) improvement from baseline a.m. PEF in the ITT group was significantly larger after SFC (+8.6 L/min, CI: [1.3; infinity]). Patients in the SFC group experienced 8.7% (CI: [1.2;16.3]) more days without asthma symptoms and 8.0% (CI: [0.6;15.3]) more days without salbutamol than patients receiving FP. Good asthma control was achieved for a longer period in the SFC (3.4 +/- 2.7 weeks) group than in the FP group (2.7 +/- 2.7, P = 0.02). Both treatments were generally well tolerated. Asthma exacerbations were recorded in 3 and 6 and SAEs in 2 and 1 patients from the SFC and FP groups, respectively.
In children with persistent asthma inadequately controlled on low dose ICS alone, adding a long acting beta-2-agonist to ICS in a single inhaler was more effective than doubling the ICS dose. These results support recommendations of adding LABA to low-dose ICS as the preferred controller option for children older than 4 years with symptomatic asthma.
对于症状无法通过标准剂量吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)控制的哮喘儿童,指南建议增加 ICS 剂量或添加其他控制药物,例如长效 ss2-激动剂(LABA)。本研究旨在比较将 ICS 剂量加倍(丙酸氟替卡松 200 微克,每日两次)与将长效β2-激动剂(沙丁胺醇 50 微克/丙酸氟替卡松 100 微克,每日两次)添加到 ICS(SFC)治疗未控制哮喘儿童的疗效和安全性。
年龄在 4 至 16 岁之间的儿童有资格参加这项多中心、随机、双盲、双模拟、平行组研究。在 14 天的导入期内,所有儿童均吸入丙酸氟替卡松 100 微克,每日两次。在>或= 14 天中有> 7 天持续症状的患者随机接受 8 周的治疗,使用含有 SFC 50 微克/ 100 微克,每日两次或丙酸氟替卡松 200 微克,每日两次的 Diskus(R)。主要终点是从基线到清晨(am)PEF 的平均变化。SFC 与 FP 非劣效性的初始统计假设在适应性中期分析中得到确认,因此该研究提前终止。
39 个中心的 441 名患者进入导入期,其中 64%的患者接受了治疗(SFC 组 N = 138,FP 组 N = 145)。经过 8 周治疗,SFC 组患者的主要和次要终点结果明显更好:SFC 组清晨 PEF 的平均增加量为 30.4 +/- 34.1 L/min,而氟替卡松组为 16.7 +/- 35.8 L/min,意向治疗(ITT)组从基线到清晨 PEF 的平均改善量在 SFC 后显著增加(+ 8.6 L/min,CI:[1.3;无穷大])。与接受 FP 的患者相比,SFC 组患者有 8.7%(CI:[1.2;16.3])更多天没有哮喘症状,8.0%(CI:[0.6;15.3])更多天没有沙丁胺醇。SFC(3.4 +/- 2.7 周)组的哮喘控制时间明显长于 FP 组(2.7 +/- 2.7,P = 0.02)。两种治疗方法通常都耐受良好。SFC 和 FP 组分别有 3 例和 6 例患者记录到哮喘恶化,2 例和 1 例患者出现严重不良事件。
在低剂量 ICS 单独治疗无法充分控制症状的哮喘儿童中,ICS 中添加长效β2-激动剂比 ICS 剂量加倍更有效。这些结果支持在 4 岁以上有症状哮喘儿童中添加 LABA 作为低剂量 ICS 的首选控制药物的建议。