Lepore S J, Evans G W, Palsane M N
Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890.
J Health Soc Behav. 1991 Dec;32(4):357-67.
Data are presented on the interactive effects of an enduring environmental stressor with acute, daily social stressors on psychological distress. A cross-sectional study of males in urban India and a longitudinal study of male and female American college students examined the interplay of these two types of stressors. In India, social hassles in the home predicted psychological symptoms only among residents of crowded homes, after statistically adjusting for income. In America, the interaction between social hassles and crowding was replicated in analyses adjusting for prior psychological symptoms, prior social acquaintanceship with housemates, and income. A six-month follow-up study with the American sample replicated the interaction. In all three analyses of the social hassle-crowding interaction, there was a main effect of crowding but no main effect of social hassles on psychological symptoms. These findings suggest that some chronic environmental stressors may increase the impact of acute social stressors, and highlight the importance of examining contextual factors in the stress and health process.
本文呈现了长期环境应激源与急性、日常社会应激源对心理困扰的交互作用的数据。一项针对印度城市男性的横断面研究以及一项针对美国男女大学生的纵向研究,考察了这两种应激源之间的相互作用。在印度,经收入因素进行统计调整后,家庭中的社会困扰仅在居住于拥挤家庭的居民中预测心理症状。在美国,在对先前心理症状、与室友的先前社会交往以及收入进行调整的分析中,重复出现了社会困扰与拥挤之间的交互作用。对美国样本进行的为期六个月的随访研究重复了这种交互作用。在所有三项关于社会困扰 - 拥挤交互作用的分析中,存在拥挤的主效应,但社会困扰对心理症状没有主效应。这些发现表明,一些慢性环境应激源可能会增加急性社会应激源的影响,并突出了在应激与健康过程中考察背景因素的重要性。