Benson Todd
International Food Policy Research Institute in Washington, DC 20006, USA.
Food Nutr Bull. 2007 Jun;28(2 Suppl):S323-30. doi: 10.1177/15648265070282S211.
Malnutrition arises from multifaceted causes and requires action from multiple sectors to address. Consequently, oversight and direction are said to be required to ensure that public goods and services needed to reduce malnutrition are delivered by the sectors responsible in a coordinated fashion. To do so, many countries have established cross-sectoral national nutrition coordination agencies.
The performance of such agencies established recently in three African countries is evaluated to determine how critical their intersectoral coordination function is to national public efforts to reduce malnutrition.
This evaluation uses qualitative information on the national institutional frameworks within which nutrition activities are carried out in Mozambique, Nigeria, and Uganda, countries with such agencies, and in Ghana, which has none. Results. None of the agencies has so far effectively carried out the three functions on which they were evaluated: cross-sectoral coordination, advocacy to sustain political commitment to address malnutrition, and resource mobilization. No cross-sectoral national nutrition initiatives are being implemented. Nutrition does not feature strategically in the master development frameworks in any country. No additional government resources have been mobilized, although international resources have been.
The agencies have proven of limited value to the malnourished in these countries. However, cross-sectoral barriers are not the primary reason for this ineffectiveness. Rather, inability to maintain continued political commitment for efforts to address malnutrition-in short, advocacy-is the principal deficiency in performance. Cross-sectoral coordination only becomes important if malnutrition itself is treated as a politically important problem, thereby stimulating action in various sectors.
营养不良由多方面原因导致,需要多个部门采取行动加以解决。因此,据说需要进行监督和指导,以确保负责的部门以协调的方式提供减少营养不良所需的公共物品和服务。为此,许多国家设立了跨部门的国家营养协调机构。
对最近在三个非洲国家设立的此类机构的绩效进行评估,以确定其跨部门协调职能对国家减少营养不良的公共努力有多关键。
本评估使用了关于莫桑比克、尼日利亚和乌干达(设有此类机构的国家)以及加纳(未设此类机构)开展营养活动的国家机构框架的定性信息。结果。到目前为止,没有一个机构有效地履行了对其评估的三项职能:跨部门协调、倡导以维持解决营养不良问题的政治承诺以及资源调动。没有实施任何跨部门的国家营养倡议。在任何一个国家,营养都未在总体发展框架中占据战略地位。虽然调动了国际资源,但没有调动额外的政府资源。
这些机构对这些国家的营养不良者的价值有限。然而,跨部门障碍并非这种无效性的主要原因。相反,无法维持对解决营养不良问题努力的持续政治承诺——简而言之,即倡导——是绩效方面的主要缺陷。只有将营养不良本身视为一个具有政治重要性的问题,从而促使各个部门采取行动,跨部门协调才会变得重要。