Suppr超能文献

线粒体靶向药物:作用机制及其在向哺乳动物线粒体递送药物和DNA方面的应用综述

Mitochondriotropics: a review of their mode of action, and their applications for drug and DNA delivery to mammalian mitochondria.

作者信息

Horobin Richard W, Trapp Stefan, Weissig Volkmar

机构信息

Division of Neurosciences and Biomedical Systems, IBLS, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

J Control Release. 2007 Aug 28;121(3):125-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.05.040. Epub 2007 Jun 14.

Abstract

Since compounds targeting mitochondria exhibit diverse accumulation mechanisms and chemical features, various questions arise. Do such "mitochondriotropics" have a characteristic chemistry? What are mitochondrial uptake mechanisms? Do mitochondriotropics necessarily accumulate in mitochondria or merely have access? Is the concept "mitochondriotropic" of any practical value? To seek answers, a non-biased sample of >100 mitochondriotropics was generated from the review literature. This dataset was examined using: physicochemical classification; quantitative structure-activity relations (QSAR) models; and a Fick-Nernst-Planck physicochemical model. The ability of the latter two approaches to predict mitochondriotropic behaviour was assessed, and comparisons made between methods, and with current assumptions. All approaches provided instructive pictures of the nature of mitochondriotropics. Thus although lipophilic cations are regarded as the commonest structural type, only a third were such. Much the same proportion were acids, potentially or actually anions. Many mitochondriotropics were electrically neutral compounds. All categorizations involved overall molecular properties, not the presence of "mitochondriotropic tags"--again contrary to literature concepts. Selective mitochondrial accumulation involved electric potential, ion-trapping, and complex formation with cardiolipin; non-specific accumulation involved membrane partitioning. Non-specific access required only low lipophilicity. Mitochondrial targeting did not preclude additional accumulation sites, e.g. lysosomes. The concept "mitochondriotropic" remains useful, although may imply access, not accumulation. QSAR and Fick-Nernst-Planck approaches are complementary--neither is universally applicable. Using both approaches enabled the mitochondriotropic behavior of >80% of the dataset to be predicted, and the physicochemistry of mitochondriotropics to be specified in some detail. This can facilitate guided syntheses and selection of optimal mitochondriotropic structures.

摘要

由于靶向线粒体的化合物表现出多样的积累机制和化学特性,因此出现了各种问题。这类“线粒体亲和性”化合物是否具有独特的化学性质?线粒体摄取机制是什么?线粒体亲和性化合物是必然在线粒体中积累,还是仅仅能够进入线粒体?“线粒体亲和性”这一概念有实际价值吗?为了寻找答案,我们从综述文献中选取了100多种无偏向性的线粒体亲和性化合物样本。使用以下方法对该数据集进行了研究:物理化学分类;定量构效关系(QSAR)模型;以及菲克 - 能斯特 - 普朗克物理化学模型。评估了后两种方法预测线粒体亲和性行为的能力,并对不同方法之间以及与当前假设进行了比较。所有方法都提供了关于线粒体亲和性化合物性质的有启发性的图景。因此,尽管亲脂性阳离子被认为是最常见的结构类型,但只有三分之一是此类。酸类的比例大致相同,可能是潜在的或实际的阴离子。许多线粒体亲和性化合物是电中性化合物。所有分类都涉及整体分子性质,而不是“线粒体亲和性标签”的存在——这同样与文献概念相悖。选择性线粒体积累涉及电势、离子捕获以及与心磷脂形成复合物;非特异性积累涉及膜分配。非特异性进入仅需要低亲脂性。线粒体靶向并不排除其他积累位点,例如溶酶体。“线粒体亲和性”这一概念仍然有用,尽管可能意味着进入,而非积累。QSAR和菲克 - 能斯特 - 普朗克方法是互补的——没有一种方法是普遍适用的。使用这两种方法能够预测数据集中80%以上化合物的线粒体亲和性行为,并较为详细地确定线粒体亲和性化合物的物理化学性质。这有助于指导合成以及选择最佳的线粒体亲和性结构。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验