• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来自埃塞俄比亚阿法尔地区阿斯博勒的中更新世猕猴科化石。

Middle Pleistocene fossil Cercopithecidae from Asbole, Afar Region, Ethiopia.

作者信息

Frost Stephen R, Alemseged Zeresenay

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, 308 Condon Hall, 1218 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.

出版信息

J Hum Evol. 2007 Sep;53(3):227-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.02.003. Epub 2007 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.02.003
PMID:17658583
Abstract

A sample of 117 fossil cercopithecids has been collected from the Middle Pleistocene site of Asbole, Afar Region, Ethiopia. A minimum of five species is present. There are two species of Cercopithecini, here recognized as cf. Chlorocebus aff. aethiops, and cf. Chlorocebus cf. patas. There are also two species of Papionini: Papio hamadryas ssp. indet. and Theropithecus oswaldi leakeyi. Finally, there is a single species of colobine present, Colobus sp. indet. The assemblage is chronologically constrained and is derived from sediments dated to approximately 600 ka. Within this sample Colobus sp. is by far the most common species present, outnumbering the other four species combined. The cercopithecid assemblage is most consistent with a woodland habitat, corroborating an earlier interpretation based on the non-primate fauna. Taxonomic, biogeographic, and evolutionary implications of the assemblage are also discussed.

摘要

从埃塞俄比亚阿法尔地区阿斯博勒的中更新世遗址采集了117份猕猴科化石样本。至少有五个物种。有两种猕猴属动物,这里分别认定为疑似阿比西尼亚绿猴和疑似赤猴。还有两种狒狒属动物:未确定亚种的阿拉伯狒狒和莱基奥氏草原狒狒。最后,有一个未确定种类的疣猴属物种,未确定的疣猴。该组合在时间上受到限制,来自约60万年的沉积物。在这个样本中,未确定的疣猴是目前最常见的物种,数量超过其他四种物种的总和。猕猴科组合与林地栖息地最为一致,这证实了基于非灵长类动物群的早期解释。还讨论了该组合在分类学、生物地理学和进化方面的意义。

相似文献

1
Middle Pleistocene fossil Cercopithecidae from Asbole, Afar Region, Ethiopia.来自埃塞俄比亚阿法尔地区阿斯博勒的中更新世猕猴科化石。
J Hum Evol. 2007 Sep;53(3):227-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.02.003. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
2
Fossil Cercopithecidae from the Middle Pleistocene Dawaitoli Formation, Middle Awash Valley, Afar region, Ethiopia.来自埃塞俄比亚阿法尔地区中阿瓦什河谷更新世中期达瓦托利组的猕猴科化石
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2007 Dec;134(4):460-71. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20688.
3
Early Pliocene Cercopithecidae from Woranso-Mille (Central Afar, Ethiopia) and the origins of the Theropithecus oswaldi lineage.来自沃兰索-米勒(埃塞俄比亚阿法尔中部)的上新世早期猕猴科动物以及奥氏长尾猴谱系的起源
J Hum Evol. 2014 Nov;76:39-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
4
Fossil Cercopithecidae from the Hadar Formation and surrounding areas of the Afar Depression, Ethiopia.来自埃塞俄比亚阿法尔洼地哈达尔组及周边地区的化石猕猴科动物。
J Hum Evol. 2002 Nov;43(5):687-748. doi: 10.1006/jhev.2002.0603.
5
Additional fossil Theropithecus from Hopefield, South Africa: a comparison with other African sites and a reevaluation of its taxonomic status.来自南非霍普菲尔德的新增化石疣猴属:与其他非洲遗址的比较及其分类地位的重新评估。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1984 Apr;63(4):405-35. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330630408.
6
Description and taxonomic assessment of fossil Cercopithecidae from the Pliocene Galili Formation (Ethiopia).描述和分类评估来自上新世加利利地层(埃塞俄比亚)的化石猴科动物。
J Hum Evol. 2024 May;190:103508. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2024.103508. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
7
Molecular phylogeny of Old World monkeys (Cercopithecidae) as inferred from gamma-globin DNA sequences.基于γ-珠蛋白DNA序列推断的旧大陆猴(猕猴科)分子系统发育
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1999 Nov;13(2):348-59. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1999.0653.
8
Cercopithecid fossils from Kanapoi, West Turkana, Kenya (2007-2015).肯尼亚图尔卡纳湖西岸卡纳波伊出土的细瘦猴化石(2007-2015 年)。
J Hum Evol. 2020 Mar;140:102642. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.102642. Epub 2020 Jan 18.
9
Fossil birds of the Kibish Formation.基比什组的化石鸟类。
J Hum Evol. 2008 Sep;55(3):513-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.06.002. Epub 2008 Jul 25.
10
Miocene cercopithecoidea from the Tugen Hills, Kenya.肯尼亚图根山中新世猴科动物。
J Hum Evol. 2010 Nov;59(5):465-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.05.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Biochronology of South African hominin-bearing sites: A reassessment using cercopithecid primates.南非含人类化石地点的生物年代学:使用长尾猴类灵长类动物的再评估。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov 8;119(45):e2210627119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2210627119. Epub 2022 Oct 24.
2
Keeping 21st Century Paleontology Grounded: Quantitative Genetic Analyses and Ancestral State Reconstruction Re-Emphasize the Essentiality of Fossils.让21世纪的古生物学脚踏实地:定量遗传分析和祖先状态重建再次强调化石的重要性。
Biology (Basel). 2022 Aug 13;11(8):1218. doi: 10.3390/biology11081218.
3
Papio Cranium from the Hominin-Bearing Site of Malapa: Implications for the Evolution of Modern Baboon Cranial Morphology and South African Plio-Pleistocene Biochronology.
来自马拉帕古人类遗址的狒狒颅骨:对现代狒狒颅骨形态演化及南非上新世-更新世生物年代学的启示
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 19;10(8):e0133361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133361. eCollection 2015.