• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尺神经强直刺激作为丙泊酚瑞芬太尼麻醉中皮肤切口心率反应预测指标的研究

Tetanic stimulus of ulnar nerve as a predictor of heart rate response to skin incision in propofol remifentanil anaesthesia.

作者信息

Rantanen M, Yppärilä-Wolters H, van Gils M, Yli-Hankala A, Huiku M, Kymäläinen M, Korhonen I

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Tampere University Hospital, PO Box 2000, FIN-33521 Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2007 Oct;99(4):509-13. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem200. Epub 2007 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1093/bja/aem200
PMID:17660520
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To study adequate antinociception during general anaesthesia, tetanic stimulus of 5-10 s duration has been used previously as a standardized nociceptive stimulus. However, such stimuli have been found to correlate poorly with intraoperative nociception. We hypothesized that an electrical tetanic stimulus of the ulnar nerve, lasting 30 s, would provide a reliable experimental pain model.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients, undergoing open abdominal surgery, were studied. Propofol and remifentanil were used for anaesthesia. Patients were randomized to receive remifentanil at three target-controlled infusion levels (1, 3, or 5 ng ml(-1)) during short (5 s, Tet5) and a long-lasting (30 s, Tet30) tetanic (50 mA, 50 Hz) stimulus and skin incision. RR intervals (RRI) were obtained from the ECG and the mean RRI before each stimulus (Tet5, Tet30, incision) was compared with that after the stimulus.

RESULTS

At remifentanil level 1 ng ml(-1), the RRI responses to tetanic stimuli and skin incision were prominent but with higher concentrations (3 and 5 mg ml(-1)), responses were very small. Tet30 (r(2)=0.780) was the best predictor of the RRI response to skin incision when compared with Tet5 (r(2)=0.611), remifentanil level (r(2)=0.340), or propofol level (r(2)=0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-lasting tetanic stimulus of ulnar nerve may provide a better experimental pain model for surgical pain during general anaesthesia than shorter stimuli, which have been applied in earlier studies.

摘要

背景

为研究全身麻醉期间的充分镇痛效果,以往曾使用持续5 - 10秒的强直刺激作为标准化伤害性刺激。然而,已发现此类刺激与术中伤害感受的相关性较差。我们推测,持续30秒的尺神经电强直刺激将提供一个可靠的实验性疼痛模型。

方法

对33例接受开腹手术的患者进行研究。采用丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼进行麻醉。患者被随机分为三组,在短时间(5秒,Tet5)和长时间(30秒,Tet30)的强直(50毫安,50赫兹)刺激及皮肤切开期间,分别接受三种靶控输注水平(1、3或5纳克/毫升)的瑞芬太尼。从心电图获取RR间期(RRI),并将每次刺激(Tet5、Tet30、切开)前的平均RRI与刺激后的平均RRI进行比较。

结果

在瑞芬太尼水平为1纳克/毫升时,对强直刺激和皮肤切开的RRI反应显著,但在较高浓度(3和5微克/毫升)时,反应非常小。与Tet5(r² = 0.611)、瑞芬太尼水平(r² = 0.340)或丙泊酚水平(r² = 0.036)相比,Tet30(r² = 0.780)是对皮肤切开RRI反应的最佳预测指标。

结论

与早期研究中应用的较短刺激相比,尺神经的长时间强直刺激可能为全身麻醉期间的手术疼痛提供更好的实验性疼痛模型。

相似文献

1
Tetanic stimulus of ulnar nerve as a predictor of heart rate response to skin incision in propofol remifentanil anaesthesia.尺神经强直刺激作为丙泊酚瑞芬太尼麻醉中皮肤切口心率反应预测指标的研究
Br J Anaesth. 2007 Oct;99(4):509-13. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem200. Epub 2007 Jul 27.
2
Heart rate variability does not discriminate between different levels of haemodynamic responsiveness during surgical anaesthesia.心率变异性无法区分手术麻醉期间不同水平的血流动力学反应性。
Br J Anaesth. 2007 Jun;98(6):728-36. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem085. Epub 2007 Apr 27.
3
Novel multiparameter approach for measurement of nociception at skin incision during general anaesthesia.全麻下测量皮肤切口痛觉的新型多参数方法。
Br J Anaesth. 2006 Mar;96(3):367-76. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael005. Epub 2006 Jan 23.
4
Low-dose remifentanil to suppress haemodynamic responses to noxious stimuli in cardiac surgery: a dose-finding study.低剂量瑞芬太尼抑制心脏手术中对有害刺激的血流动力学反应:一项剂量探索性研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2007 May;98(5):598-603. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem069. Epub 2007 Apr 10.
5
The response of the composite variability index to a standardized noxious stimulus during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia.复合变异指数对丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼麻醉期间标准化伤害性刺激的反应。
Anesth Analg. 2013 Mar;116(3):580-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31827ced18. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
6
Comparisons of Electroencephalographically Derived Measures of Hypnosis and Antinociception in Response to Standardized Stimuli During Target-Controlled Propofol-Remifentanil Anesthesia.在靶控丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼麻醉期间,对标准化刺激做出反应时,脑电图衍生的催眠和抗伤害感受指标的比较。
Anesth Analg. 2016 Feb;122(2):382-92. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001029.
7
[Evaluation of heart rate variability for monitoring the depth of anaesthesia in dogs. Investigations based on total intravenous anaesthesia using propofol alone or in combination with dexmedetomidine or remifentanil].[评估心率变异性以监测犬的麻醉深度。基于单独使用丙泊酚或与右美托咪定或瑞芬太尼联合使用进行全静脉麻醉的研究]
Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere. 2015;43(1):1-10. doi: 10.15654/TPK-130744. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
8
A targeted remifentanil administration protocol based on the analgesia nociception index during vascular surgery.血管手术中基于镇痛伤害指数的靶向瑞芬太尼给药方案。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2017 Aug;36(4):229-232. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
9
Assessment of surgical stress during general anaesthesia.全身麻醉期间手术应激的评估。
Br J Anaesth. 2007 Apr;98(4):447-55. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem004. Epub 2007 Feb 28.
10
Monitoring of the responsiveness to noxious stimuli during anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil by using RIII reflex threshold and bispectral index.使用 RIII 反射阈和双频谱指数监测异丙酚和瑞芬太尼麻醉时对有害刺激的反应性。
Br J Anaesth. 2010 Feb;104(2):201-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep357. Epub 2009 Dec 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrasound Measurement of Pupillary Dilation Reflex During Induction of General Anesthesia Using Sufentanil: A Randomized Controlled Trial.使用舒芬太尼诱导全身麻醉期间瞳孔散大反射的超声测量:一项随机对照试验
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Jun 23;31:e948209. doi: 10.12659/MSM.948209.
2
Photoplethysmography parameters in monitoring nociception during general anesthesia.全身麻醉期间监测伤害感受的光电容积脉搏波描记术参数
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Feb 17;25(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-02932-3.
3
Evaluation and correlation of nociceptive response index and spectral entropy indices as monitors of nociception in anesthetized patients.
评估伤害性反应指数和频谱熵指数作为麻醉患者伤害感受监测指标的相关性。
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2023 Jul-Sep;14(3):440-446. doi: 10.25259/JNRP_75_2023. Epub 2023 May 20.
4
EEG responses to standardised noxious stimulation during clinical anaesthesia: a pilot study.临床麻醉期间对标准化有害刺激的脑电图反应:一项初步研究。
BJA Open. 2022 Dec 30;5:100118. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2022.100118. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Semimechanistic models to relate noxious stimulation, movement, and pupillary dilation responses in the presence of opioids.在阿片类药物存在的情况下,将有害刺激、运动和瞳孔扩张反应联系起来的半机械模型。
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2022 May;11(5):581-593. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12729. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
6
Two different methods to assess sympathetic tone during general anesthesia lead to different findings.两种不同的评估全身麻醉期间自主神经张力的方法得出了不同的结果。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2019 Jun;33(3):463-469. doi: 10.1007/s10877-018-0175-7. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
7
Pupillary reflex dilation in response to incremental nociceptive stimuli in patients receiving intravenous ketamine.接受静脉注射氯胺酮的患者对递增性伤害性刺激的瞳孔反射性扩张。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2018 Oct;32(5):921-928. doi: 10.1007/s10877-017-0072-5. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
8
The Effect of Tracheal Intubation-Induced Autonomic Response on Photoplethysmography.气管插管诱导的自主反应对光电容积脉搏波描记法的影响。
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2017;2017:7646541. doi: 10.1155/2017/7646541. Epub 2017 Apr 2.