• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 RIII 反射阈和双频谱指数监测异丙酚和瑞芬太尼麻醉时对有害刺激的反应性。

Monitoring of the responsiveness to noxious stimuli during anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil by using RIII reflex threshold and bispectral index.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2010 Feb;104(2):201-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep357. Epub 2009 Dec 22.

DOI:10.1093/bja/aep357
PMID:20031950
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Movement responses are an important indicator of noxious perception in the unconscious state. To allow for a continual monitoring of the responsiveness to noxious stimuli during general anaesthesia, surrogate parameters are needed. Here we compare the performance of the bispectral index (BIS) and the RIII threshold in predicting reactions to noxious stimuli during anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil.

METHODS

Twenty male volunteers were included. The first 10 subjects received constant concentrations of propofol while remifentanil concentrations were increased stepwise. The other 10 subjects each received high propofol concentrations combined with different low remifentanil concentrations and also low propofol concentrations combined with different high remifentanil concentrations. In all subjects, the reactions to an 80 mA 30 s tetanic stimulus were tested every 5 min. BIS and RIII threshold were recorded continually in all subjects.

RESULTS

Nineteen subjects completed the study. The population prediction probability for reactions to the noxious stimuli amounted to 0.86 for the BIS and to 0.84 for the RIII threshold in the first 10 subjects (P>0.05, PKDMACRO). In the other nine subjects, the prediction probabilities amounted to 0.64 for the BIS and to 0.77 for the RIII threshold (P<0.05, PKDMACRO). All population prediction probability values differed significantly from 0.5 (P<0.01, PKDMACRO).

CONCLUSIONS

RIII threshold and BIS are both influenced dose-dependently by remifentanil at those concentrations that suppress reactions to noxious stimuli. The susceptibility of the parameters to remifentanil concentration seems to be of a similar quality. Under different ratios of propofol and remifentanil concentrations, the RIII threshold correlates with non-responsiveness better than the BIS.

摘要

背景

运动反应是无意识状态下痛觉感知的一个重要指标。为了在全身麻醉期间持续监测对伤害性刺激的反应,需要替代参数。在这里,我们比较了脑电双频指数(BIS)和 RIII 阈值在预测异丙酚和瑞芬太尼麻醉期间对伤害性刺激反应的性能。

方法

纳入 20 名男性志愿者。前 10 名受试者接受恒定浓度的异丙酚,同时瑞芬太尼浓度逐步增加。另外 10 名受试者分别接受高浓度异丙酚和不同低浓度瑞芬太尼的组合,以及低浓度异丙酚和不同高浓度瑞芬太尼的组合。在所有受试者中,每 5 分钟测试一次 80 mA 30 s 强直刺激的反应。所有受试者均连续记录 BIS 和 RIII 阈值。

结果

19 名受试者完成了研究。对于前 10 名受试者,BIS 对伤害性刺激反应的群体预测概率为 0.86,RIII 阈值为 0.84(P>0.05,PKDMACRO)。在另外 9 名受试者中,BIS 的预测概率为 0.64,RIII 阈值为 0.77(P<0.05,PKDMACRO)。所有群体预测概率值与 0.5 有显著差异(P<0.01,PKDMACRO)。

结论

在抑制伤害性刺激反应的浓度下,RIII 阈值和 BIS 均受瑞芬太尼的剂量依赖性影响。参数对瑞芬太尼浓度的敏感性似乎具有相似的质量。在不同的异丙酚和瑞芬太尼浓度比例下,RIII 阈值与无反应性的相关性优于 BIS。

相似文献

1
Monitoring of the responsiveness to noxious stimuli during anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil by using RIII reflex threshold and bispectral index.使用 RIII 反射阈和双频谱指数监测异丙酚和瑞芬太尼麻醉时对有害刺激的反应性。
Br J Anaesth. 2010 Feb;104(2):201-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep357. Epub 2009 Dec 22.
2
Comparison of the nociceptive flexion reflex threshold and the bispectral index as monitors of movement responses to noxious stimuli under propofol mono-anaesthesia.在丙泊酚单一麻醉下,伤害性屈曲反射阈值与脑电双频指数作为有害刺激运动反应监测指标的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2009 Feb;102(2):244-50. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen351. Epub 2008 Dec 9.
3
Monitoring of the responsiveness to noxious stimuli during sevoflurane mono-anaesthesia by using RIII reflex threshold and bispectral index.使用 RIII 反射阈和双频谱指数监测七氟醚单麻醉期间对有害刺激的反应性。
Br J Anaesth. 2010 Jun;104(6):740-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq099. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
4
Effect site concentrations of remifentanil and pupil response to noxious stimulation.瑞芬太尼的效应室浓度与瞳孔对有害刺激的反应。
Br J Anaesth. 2003 Sep;91(3):347-52. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg178.
5
Spectral entropy measurement of patient responsiveness during propofol and remifentanil. A comparison with the bispectral index.丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼麻醉期间患者反应性的熵指数监测:与脑电双频指数的比较
Br J Anaesth. 2004 Nov;93(5):645-54. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh251. Epub 2004 Aug 20.
6
Comparison of Alaris AEP index and bispectral index during propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia.丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼麻醉期间Alaris听觉诱发电位指数与脑电双频指数的比较
Br J Anaesth. 2003 Sep;91(3):336-40. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg189.
7
Modeling the influence of the A118G polymorphism in the OPRM1 gene and of noxious stimulation on the synergistic relation between propofol and remifentanil: sedation and analgesia in endoscopic procedures.建模 A118G 多态性在 OPRM1 基因中的作用和有害刺激对异丙酚和瑞芬太尼协同关系的影响:内镜检查中的镇静和镇痛。
Anesthesiology. 2013 Jun;118(6):1395-407. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31828e1544.
8
Effect of remifentanil on plasma propofol concentration and bispectral index during propofol anaesthesia.瑞芬太尼对丙泊酚麻醉时血浆丙泊酚浓度和脑电双频指数的影响。
Br J Anaesth. 2011 Feb;106(2):208-14. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq334. Epub 2010 Nov 29.
9
Ketamine has no effect on bispectral index during stable propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia.在稳定的丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼麻醉期间,氯胺酮对脑电双频指数无影响。
Br J Anaesth. 2009 Mar;102(3):336-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen403. Epub 2009 Feb 2.
10
Ability of the bispectral index, autoregressive modelling with exogenous input-derived auditory evoked potentials, and predicted propofol concentrations to measure patient responsiveness during anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil.双谱指数、基于外源性输入的听觉诱发电位自回归模型以及预测的丙泊酚浓度在丙泊酚与瑞芬太尼麻醉期间测量患者反应性的能力。
Anesthesiology. 2003 Oct;99(4):802-12. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200310000-00010.

引用本文的文献

1
The nociceptive withdrawal reflex during spinal analgesia in pigs undergoing veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a prospective observational study.接受静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合的猪在脊髓镇痛期间的伤害性退缩反射:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Dec 11;11:1449297. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1449297. eCollection 2024.
2
How Is the Nociceptive Withdrawal Reflex Influenced by Increasing Doses of Propofol in Pigs?猪体内递增剂量的丙泊酚如何影响伤害性退缩反射?
Animals (Basel). 2024 Apr 2;14(7):1081. doi: 10.3390/ani14071081.
3
Different perspectives for monitoring nociception during general anesthesia.
全身麻醉期间监测伤害感受的不同视角。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2022 Apr;75(2):112-123. doi: 10.4097/kja.22002. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
4
Measurement of the nociceptive flexion reflex threshold in critically ill patients - a randomized observational pilot study.危重患者伤害性屈肌反射阈值的测量——一项随机观察性初步研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Nov 5;21(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01490-8.
5
Impact of Propofol Bolus Administration on the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex Threshold and Bispectral Index in Children-A Case Series.丙泊酚单次给药对儿童伤害性屈曲反射阈值和脑电双频指数的影响——病例系列研究
Children (Basel). 2021 Jul 27;8(8):639. doi: 10.3390/children8080639.
6
Prediction of Hemodynamic Reactivity by Electroencephalographically Derived Pain Threshold Index in Children Undergoing General Anesthesia: A Prospective Observational Study.脑电图衍生的疼痛阈值指数对接受全身麻醉儿童血流动力学反应性的预测:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Pain Res. 2019 Dec 3;12:3245-3255. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S231596. eCollection 2019.
7
Objective Nociceptive Assessment in Ventilated ICU Patients: A Feasibility Study Using Pupillometry and the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex.机械通气重症监护病房患者的伤害性评估:一项使用瞳孔测量法和伤害性屈曲反射的可行性研究
J Vis Exp. 2018 Jul 4(137):57972. doi: 10.3791/57972.
8
Recent advance in patient monitoring.患者监测的最新进展。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010 Sep;59(3):144-59. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2010.59.3.144. Epub 2010 Sep 20.