Hey M, Kevanishvili I, von Specht H, Begall K, Kevanishvili Z
St. Salvator Hospital, Halberstadt, and Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Georgian Med News. 2007 Jun(147):43-9.
The waveforms and parameters of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses, eeABRs, registered in cochlear implant users, were compared with those of acoustically evoked auditory brainstem responses, aeABRs, recorded in normally hearing subjects. The eeABRs, in contrast to the aeABRs, contained dubious Wave IV, while missed Waves VI and VII. The eeABRs possessed also shorter peak-latencies, shorter inter-peak intervals, and greater amplitudes. The revealed differences have been explained by the lack of cochlear mechanisms in cochlear implant recipients. On the other hand, eeABRs and aeABRs exhibited similar stimulus intensity dependence. Both had also lower thresholds, shorter peak-latencies, and greater amplitudes in females than in males.
将人工耳蜗使用者记录的电诱发听觉脑干反应(eeABR)的波形和参数,与正常听力受试者记录的声诱发听觉脑干反应(aeABR)的波形和参数进行了比较。与aeABR相比,eeABR包含可疑的波IV,而波VI和波VII缺失。eeABR还具有较短的峰潜伏期、较短的峰间间隔和较大的振幅。所揭示的差异已通过人工耳蜗接受者缺乏耳蜗机制来解释。另一方面,eeABR和aeABR表现出相似的刺激强度依赖性。女性的阈值也更低,峰潜伏期更短,振幅比男性更大。