Wang Xi-lin, Huang Hai-yan
Department of Acupuncture & Moxibustion, TCM Hospital of Guilin, Guangxi 541002, China.
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2007 Jun;27(6):415-6.
To compare therapeutic effects of long-time needle retention at Baihui (GV 20) and routine needle retention on vertebroarterial cervical spondylopathy.
One hundred and twenty cases of vertebroarterial cervical spondylopathy were randomly divided into a treatment group and a control group, 60 cases in each group. The treatment group were treated with needle retention at Baihui (GV 20) for 8 h and electroacupuncture at local points, and the control group with needle retention at Baihui (GV 20) for 30 min and electroacupuncture at local points.
The cured rate and the total effective rate were 70.0% and 98.3% in the treatment group and 45.0% and 86.7 in the control group with very significant difference or significant difference in the cured rate and the total effective rate between the two groups (P < 0.01, P < 0.05).
Long-time needle retention at Baihui (GV 20) has a better therapeutic effect on vertebroarterial cervical spondylopathy.
比较百会穴(GV 20)长时间留针与常规留针治疗椎动脉型颈椎病的疗效。
将120例椎动脉型颈椎病患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组60例。治疗组采用百会穴(GV 20)留针8小时并配合局部电针治疗,对照组采用百会穴(GV 20)留针30分钟并配合局部电针治疗。
治疗组治愈率和总有效率分别为70.0%和98.3%,对照组分别为45.0%和86.7%,两组治愈率和总有效率比较差异有非常显著性意义或显著性意义(P < 0.01,P < 0.05)。
百会穴(GV 20)长时间留针治疗椎动脉型颈椎病疗效较好。