Guérin Patrice, Gouëffic Yann, Heymann Marie-Françoise, Pillet Paul, Al Habash Oussama, Crochet Dominique, Pacaud Pierre, Loirand Gervaise
Inserm, U533, l'institut du thorax, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France.
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Aug;46(2):354-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.04.063.
The use of sirolimus eluting stent (SES) has strongly limited the incidence of in-stent restenosis that still remains a problem at the stent edge. The aim of this study was to analyze the neointimal thickening after implantation of SES and to assess the influence of the stent implantation procedure on the neointimal thickening in the in-stent segment and at the edge of the stent in an ex-vivo model of stented human artery.
Both balloon expandable SES and the corresponding bare metal stent (BMS) were used in a model of human mammary artery culture. Stents were implanted either directly or after predilatation (10 atm, 60 seconds) and analysis of arterial segments were performed at 28 days poststenting. Cell proliferation and neointimal thickening were assessed by immunohistochemistry, western blotting, and histomorphometry, both in the in-stent segment and at the edge of the stent. Neointimal thickening was expressed as the ratio ([neointimal area/neointimal area + media area]).
The in-stent neointimal thickening was dramatically inhibited in the SES group compared with the BMS group whatever the stenting technique was (predilatation: 0.22 +/- 0.05 vs 0.30 +/- 0.10; P < .04; direct stenting 0.16 +/- 0.04 vs 0.30 +/- 0.13; P <.01). This effect of SES was associated with a smallest expression of the small G protein RhoA and an increase of p27kip expression. In the BMS group, predilatation and direct stenting gave similar in-stent neointimal thickening. In contrast, in the SES group, in-stent neointimal thickening was significantly reduced when direct stenting was performed (0.16 +/- 0.04 [direct stenting] vs 0.22 +/- 0.05 [predilatation], P < .03). At the stent edge, a similar neointimal thickening was observed with both type of stent when predilatation was performed on the entire segment of the artery. Direct stenting significantly reduced the neointimal thickness at the stent edge when SES where used (0.06 +/- 0.01 [direct stenting] vs 0.19 +/- 0.06 [predilatation]; P < .001) but not in the BMS group.
These results confirm the efficiency of sirolimus released form SES to inhibit RhoA expression and to increase p27kip level in the arterial wall and show the benefit of direct stenting to limit the edge effect with SES.
西罗莫司洗脱支架(SES)的使用极大地降低了支架内再狭窄的发生率,但支架边缘再狭窄仍是一个问题。本研究旨在分析SES植入后的新生内膜增厚情况,并在人动脉支架植入的体外模型中评估支架植入操作对支架内节段和支架边缘新生内膜增厚的影响。
在人乳动脉培养模型中使用球囊扩张式SES和相应的裸金属支架(BMS)。支架直接植入或预扩张(10个大气压,60秒)后植入,在支架植入后28天对动脉节段进行分析。通过免疫组织化学、蛋白质印迹法和组织形态计量学评估支架内节段和支架边缘的细胞增殖和新生内膜增厚情况。新生内膜增厚以[新生内膜面积/(新生内膜面积+中膜面积)]的比值表示。
无论采用何种支架植入技术(预扩张:SES组0.22±0.05,BMS组0.30±0.10;P<.04;直接植入:SES组0.16±0.04,BMS组0.30±0.13;P<.01),SES组的支架内新生内膜增厚均较BMS组显著受到抑制。SES的这种作用与小G蛋白RhoA的最小表达及p27kip表达增加有关。在BMS组中,预扩张和直接植入的支架内新生内膜增厚相似。相反,在SES组中,直接植入时支架内新生内膜增厚显著降低(直接植入0.16±0.04对比预扩张0.22±0.05,P<.03)。在支架边缘,当对动脉的整个节段进行预扩张时,两种类型的支架观察到相似的新生内膜增厚。使用SES时,直接植入显著降低了支架边缘的新生内膜厚度(直接植入0.06±0.01对比预扩张0.19±0.06;P<.001),但在BMS组中未观察到这种情况。
这些结果证实了SES释放的西罗莫司抑制动脉壁中RhoA表达和增加p27kip水平的有效性,并表明直接植入对限制SES的边缘效应有益。