Auchus A P, Brashear H R, Salloway S, Korczyn A D, De Deyn P P, Gassmann-Mayer C
University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Department of Neurology, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.
Neurology. 2007 Jul 31;69(5):448-58. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000266625.31615.f6.
To evaluate efficacy and safety of galantamine for patients with vascular dementia (VaD).
In this multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial, 788 patients with probable VaD who also satisfied strict centrally read MRI criteria were randomized to receive galantamine or placebo. Efficacy was evaluated using measures of cognition, daily function, and behavior. The primary efficacy measures were the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog/11) and the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL) total score. Secondary outcomes included the Clinician's Interview Based on Impression of Change-Plus Caregiver Input (CIBIC-plus), Neuropsychiatric Inventory, and EXIT-25 for assessment of executive functioning. Safety and tolerability were also monitored.
Patients treated with galantamine had a greater improvement in ADAS-cog/11 after 26 weeks compared with placebo (-1.8 vs -0.3; p < 0.001). There was no difference between galantamine and placebo at week 26 on the ADCS-ADL score (0.7 vs 1.3; p = 0.783). Improvement in global functioning measured by the CIBIC-plus associated with galantamine approached significance (p = 0.069). A difference between treatment groups for EXIT-25 favoring galantamine was detected (p = 0.041). Safety data revealed that 13% of galantamine and 6% of placebo patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events.
Significance was not reached for both co-primary endpoints. Galantamine was effective for improving cognition, including executive function, in patients with vascular dementia, with good safety and tolerability. However, improvement in activities of daily living with galantamine was similar to that observed with placebo.
评估加兰他敏对血管性痴呆(VaD)患者的疗效和安全性。
在这项多国、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组临床试验中,788例可能患有VaD且同时满足严格的中心阅片MRI标准的患者被随机分配接受加兰他敏或安慰剂治疗。使用认知、日常功能和行为指标评估疗效。主要疗效指标为阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知分量表(ADAS-cog/11)和阿尔茨海默病协作研究日常生活活动量表(ADCS-ADL)总分。次要结局包括基于变化印象加照顾者意见的临床医生访谈(CIBIC-plus)、神经精神科问卷和用于评估执行功能的EXIT-25。同时监测安全性和耐受性。
与安慰剂相比,加兰他敏治疗的患者在26周后ADAS-cog/11有更大改善(-1.8对-0.3;p<0.001)。在第26周时,加兰他敏和安慰剂在ADCS-ADL评分上无差异(0.7对1.3;p = 0.783)。通过CIBIC-plus评估的整体功能改善与加兰他敏相关,接近显著水平(p = 0.069)。检测到治疗组在EXIT-25上有利于加兰他敏的差异(p = 0.041)。安全性数据显示,13%的加兰他敏治疗患者和6%的安慰剂治疗患者因不良事件停药。
两个共同主要终点均未达到显著水平。加兰他敏对改善血管性痴呆患者的认知有效,包括执行功能,且安全性和耐受性良好。然而,加兰他敏对日常生活活动的改善与安慰剂相似。