Suppr超能文献

成年心脏手术患者的死亡率预测:两种风险分层模型的比较

Mortality prediction in adult cardiac surgery patients: comparison of two risk stratification models.

作者信息

Au W K, Sun M P, Lam K T, Cheng L C, Chiu S W, Das S R

机构信息

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Grantham Hospital, Aberdeen, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Hong Kong Med J. 2007 Aug;13(4):293-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess and compare the two commonly applied models--EuroSCORE and Parsonnet--in our local adult cardiac surgery patients, according to risk factor quantification related to mortality using a risk stratification protocol to assess the quality of cardiac surgical care.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Cardiac surgery centre in a regional hospital in Hong Kong.

PATIENTS

All adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft and heart valve surgery at the Grantham Hospital were evaluated prospectively from November 1999 to July 2005.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

In-hospital mortality was the defined end-point. Statistical analyses consisted of observed against expected mortality, Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test for calibration accuracy, and receiver operating characteristic curve for discrimination performance.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1247 patients underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery and 1406 underwent heart valve surgery. Observed mortality rates in these two patient groups were 2.9% and 4.8% respectively. The expected mortality rates as predicted by the EuroSCORE were (mean+/-standard deviation) 4.0+/-3.3% and 5.2+/-3.0% respectively, and by the Parsonnet model were 5.9+/-4.2% and 7.3+/-4.4% respectively. EuroSCORE performed better than the Parsonnet model at predicting in-hospital mortality assessed by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves in coronary artery bypass graft surgery were 0.76 for EuroSCORE and 0.74 for Parsonnet. The receiver operating characteristic curve areas in valve surgery were 0.77 for EuroSCORE and 0.79 for Parsonnet.

CONCLUSION

Despite significant geographic and demographic differences between European and Asian patients, in our local adult cardiac surgery patients, the EuroSCORE performed well with good calibration and discrimination in predicting mortality. There was a tendency for both models to over predict. However, the EuroSCORE can serve as a baseline for the development of a local risk model.

摘要

目的

根据与死亡率相关的风险因素量化,采用风险分层方案评估心脏外科护理质量,以评估和比较两种常用模型——欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)和帕森内特模型(Parsonnet)在本地成年心脏手术患者中的应用情况。

设计

前瞻性研究。

地点

香港一家地区医院的心脏外科中心。

患者

1999年11月至2005年7月期间,对所有在葛量洪医院接受冠状动脉搭桥术和心脏瓣膜手术的成年患者进行前瞻性评估。

主要观察指标

住院死亡率为定义的终点。统计分析包括观察到的死亡率与预期死亡率的对比、用于校准准确性的Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验,以及用于鉴别性能的受试者工作特征曲线。

结果

在研究期间,1247例患者接受了冠状动脉搭桥术,1406例患者接受了心脏瓣膜手术。这两组患者的观察到的死亡率分别为2.9%和4.8%。欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统预测的预期死亡率分别为(均值±标准差)4.0±3.3%和5.2±3.0%,帕森内特模型预测的预期死亡率分别为5.9±4.2%和7.3±4.4%。通过Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验评估,欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统在预测住院死亡率方面比帕森内特模型表现更好。在冠状动脉搭桥手术中,欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.76,帕森内特模型为0.74。在瓣膜手术中,欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统的受试者工作特征曲线面积为0.77,帕森内特模型为0.79。

结论

尽管欧洲和亚洲患者在地理和人口统计学上存在显著差异,但在我们本地成年心脏手术患者中,欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统在预测死亡率方面校准良好且鉴别能力强,表现出色。两种模型都有过度预测的趋势。然而,欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统可作为开发本地风险模型的基线。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验