Palacios Manuel, Friedrich Holger, Götze Christine, Vallverdú Montserrat, de Luna Antonio Bayes, Caminal Pere, Hoyer Dirk
Dep. ESAII, Centre for Biomedical Engineering Research, Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.
Physiol Meas. 2007 Jun;28(6):677-88. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/28/6/006. Epub 2007 May 15.
Risk stratification of patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) is an epidemiologically relevant question. But the results based on conventional heart rate variability (HRV) analysis are still unsatisfactory. The adjustments within the cardiovascular system incorporate nonlinear and complex mechanisms of information exchange which may have additional prognostic value. It is an objective of the present work to evaluate the prognostic value of autonomic information flow (AIF) measures in IDC patients compared to conventional HRV measures in a first explorative study. Holter recordings of 32 patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) and 12 normal subjects (NRM) were analyzed. The IDC patients consisted of two groups: 10 high risk (HR) patients, after aborted sudden cardiac death (SCD); 22 low risk (LR) patients, without SCD. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and ROC characteristics of a comprehensive set of AIF measures, organized according to the conventional HRV standards, and conventional HRV measures were investigated. The significant risk predictors were evaluated by Spearman's rank correlation. While the only traditional HRV measure discriminating IDC patients from NRM was ln(LF) most of the AIF measures had a discriminatory value. Concerning the prognosis of the IDC patients by conventional HRV we found that SDNN and all frequency band measures (lnHF, lnLF, lnVLF) significantly discriminated HR from LR. Among the AIF measures the time shift related peak decay (PD(dHF)) reflecting the HF band information flow had a prognostic value. PD(dHF) was identified as a promising candidate which might improve the predictive value of traditional HRV analysis, predominantly represented by SDNN. A subsequent comprehensive clinical study is necessary to validate this hypothesis.
对特发性扩张型心肌病(IDC)患者进行风险分层是一个具有流行病学意义的问题。但基于传统心率变异性(HRV)分析的结果仍不尽人意。心血管系统内的调节包含信息交换的非线性和复杂机制,这可能具有额外的预后价值。本研究的目的是在一项初步探索性研究中,评估自主信息流(AIF)指标相较于传统HRV指标在IDC患者中的预后价值。分析了32例特发性扩张型心肌病(IDC)患者和12例正常受试者(NRM)的动态心电图记录。IDC患者分为两组:10例高危(HR)患者,曾发生心脏性猝死(SCD)未遂;22例低危(LR)患者,未发生SCD。按照传统HRV标准组织的一组综合AIF指标以及传统HRV指标的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和ROC特征进行了研究。通过Spearman等级相关性评估显著的风险预测因子。虽然唯一能将IDC患者与NRM区分开的传统HRV指标是ln(LF),但大多数AIF指标都具有鉴别价值。关于传统HRV对IDC患者的预后评估,我们发现SDNN和所有频段指标(lnHF、lnLF、lnVLF)能显著区分HR组和LR组。在AIF指标中,反映HF频段信息流的时移相关峰值衰减(PD(dHF))具有预后价值。PD(dHF)被确定为一个有前景的指标,可能会提高以SDNN为主的传统HRV分析的预测价值。后续需要进行全面的临床研究来验证这一假设。