Pun Brenda T, Dunn Jan
Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, TN, USA.
Am J Nurs. 2007 Aug;107(8):40-9; quiz 50. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000282293.72946.1f.
The prevention and treatment of pain, anxiety, and delirium in the ICU are important goals. But achieving a balance between sedation and analgesia, especially in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation, can be challenging. Both under- and oversedation carry grave risks. Without having an agreed-upon end point for sedation, different providers will likely have disparate treatment goals, increasing the risk of iatrogenic complications and possibly impeding recovery. In 2002 the Society of Critical Care Medicine, along with the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, updated recommendations in its clinical practice guidelines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in adults. This two-part series examines those recommendations concerning sedation assessment and management, as well as the current literature. Last month, Part 1 reviewed pertinent recommendations concerning pain and delirium and discussed tools for assessing pain, delirium, and sedation. This month, Part 2 explores pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic management of anxiety and agitation in the ICU. The second in a two-part series focuses on the pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic management of anxiety and agitation in the ICU.
重症监护病房(ICU)中疼痛、焦虑和谵妄的防治是重要目标。但在镇静与镇痛之间取得平衡,尤其是对于接受机械通气的重症患者而言,可能具有挑战性。镇静不足和过度镇静均存在严重风险。在没有商定的镇静终点的情况下,不同的医疗人员可能会有不同的治疗目标,从而增加医源性并发症的风险,并可能阻碍康复。2002年,危重病医学会与美国卫生系统药师协会共同更新了其关于成人持续使用镇静剂和镇痛药的临床实践指南中的建议。这个系列分两部分,审视了那些关于镇静评估与管理的建议以及当前的文献。上个月,第1部分回顾了有关疼痛和谵妄的相关建议,并讨论了评估疼痛、谵妄和镇静的工具。本月,第2部分探讨ICU中焦虑和躁动的药物及非药物管理。这个系列的第2部分聚焦于ICU中焦虑和躁动的药物及非药物管理。