Halvorson Eric G, Disa Joseph J, Mehrara Babak J, Burkey Brooke A, Pusic Andrea L, Cordeiro Peter G
Plastic and Reconstructive Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Ann Plast Surg. 2007 Aug;59(2):131-6. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000252716.73356.68.
Although several studies have analyzed risk factors for tissue expander removal prior to permanent implant placement in breast reconstruction, the outcome following explantation because of infection is unknown. From a prospectively maintained database covering a 10-year period, 39 such patients were identified. Twelve (30.8%) had prior radiotherapy. Nine patients (23%) underwent reexpansion, 3 (7.7%) had a latissimus dorsi flap and expander, and 1 (2.6%) received a free transverse rectus abdominis flap. Recurrent infection occurred in 1 reexpanded patient. Two patients developed late contractures. All other reconstructions were successful. Twenty-six patients (66.7%) did not undergo secondary reconstruction, most commonly due to a combination of patient preference, cancer progression, and radiotherapy. After removal of an infected expander, most patients who are interested and remain good candidates can still be reconstructed. Reexpansion was successful in patients without prior radiotherapy. Secondary reconstruction with autologous tissue is appropriate when there is a history of radiotherapy.
尽管有多项研究分析了在乳房重建中植入永久性假体之前取出组织扩张器的危险因素,但因感染而取出扩张器后的结果尚不清楚。从一个前瞻性维护的涵盖10年的数据库中,识别出39例此类患者。其中12例(30.8%)曾接受过放疗。9例患者(23%)进行了再次扩张,3例(7.7%)采用了背阔肌肌皮瓣联合扩张器,1例(2.6%)接受了游离腹直肌肌皮瓣。1例再次扩张的患者发生了复发性感染。2例患者出现了晚期挛缩。所有其他重建均成功。26例患者(66.7%)未进行二次重建,最常见的原因是患者偏好、癌症进展和放疗的综合因素。取出感染的扩张器后,大多数有意愿且仍为合适候选者的患者仍可进行重建。未接受过放疗的患者再次扩张成功。有放疗史的患者采用自体组织进行二次重建是合适的。