Wassenaar E B, Raymakers J T F J, Rakic S
Department of Surgery, Twenteborg Hospital, P.O. Box 7600, 7600 SZ Almelo, The Netherlands.
Hernia. 2008 Feb;12(1):23-5. doi: 10.1007/s10029-007-0269-5. Epub 2007 Aug 1.
Fixation of the prosthesis is one of the critical components of laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernia (LRVIH). The impact of the fixation technique used on operative time has never been analyzed. We compared the duration of the operation according to the fixation technique used in a series of 138 patients with primary umbilical hernia.
All patients underwent a straightforward repair by using completely standardized techniques. One hundred and seven patients had mesh fixation with a single crown of tackers (ProTack), TycoUSS, Norwalk, CT) and eight transabdominal sutures (TAS). Thirty-one patients had mesh fixation with a double crown of tackers (DC) without TAS.
There were no significant differences in age, sex, hospital stay, and morbidity between the two groups. Mean operating time for the technique with TAS was 50.6 min compared to 41.4 min for the DC technique. The mean difference in operating time was 9.2 min. This difference was significant (P=0.002). During a mean follow-up of 26.4 months, there were no recurrences in the entire series.
The difference in operative times between the two operative techniques can be entirely accounted to the difference in the time needed for insertion of eight TAS as compared to the time needed for application of an inner crown of tackers. This strongly indicates that insertion of every single TAS prolongs LRVIH for approximately 1 min. As long as no significant differences between the two fixation techniques are demonstrated on issues of recurrence, complications, and postoperative pain, the time difference we have measured might be an argument in favor of the DC technique, especially when mesh fixation would require a large number of TAS.
假体固定是腹腔镜腹直肌旁疝和切口疝修补术(LRVIH)的关键组成部分之一。尚未分析所使用的固定技术对手术时间的影响。我们根据一系列138例原发性脐疝患者所使用的固定技术比较了手术持续时间。
所有患者均采用完全标准化技术进行直接修补。107例患者采用单排钉合器(ProTack,泰科美国公司,诺沃克,康涅狄格州)和8根经腹缝线(TAS)进行补片固定。31例患者采用双排钉合器(DC)进行补片固定,未使用TAS。
两组患者在年龄、性别、住院时间和发病率方面无显著差异。使用TAS技术的平均手术时间为50.6分钟,而DC技术为41.4分钟。手术时间的平均差异为9.2分钟。这一差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.002)。在平均26.4个月的随访期间,整个系列中无复发病例。
两种手术技术之间手术时间的差异完全可归因于与应用一排钉合器所需时间相比,插入8根TAS所需时间的差异。这有力地表明,每插入一根TAS会使LRVIH延长约1分钟。只要在复发、并发症和术后疼痛问题上未显示出两种固定技术之间存在显著差异,我们所测量的时间差异可能支持DC技术,尤其是在补片固定需要大量TAS的情况下。