Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room No. 5021, 5th Floor Teaching Block, New Delhi, India.
Surg Endosc. 2012 Dec;26(12):3476-85. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2390-5. Epub 2012 Jun 23.
Technique of mesh fixation in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is a matter of debate. Literature is lacking in randomized trials comparing various methods of mesh fixation. This study was designed to compare the cost-effectiveness and long-term outcomes following the two methods of mesh fixation.
A total of 110 patients were randomized to tacker mesh fixation or suture mesh fixation. Patients with nonrecurrent hernias with defect size ranging from 2 to 5 cm were included. The cost and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated. SF-36v2 health survey was used for quality-of-life analysis. Patients were followed up at regular intervals, and return to activity and satisfaction scores were recorded.
Demographic profile and hernia characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Operation time was significantly higher (p < 0) and early postoperative pain at 1 h, 6 h, and 1 month was significantly lower in the suture group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of chronic pain and seroma formation over a mean follow-up of 32.2 months. Cost of procedure was significantly higher in group I (p < 0.001). Suture fixation was found to be more cost-effective than tacker fixation. Postoperative quality of life outcomes were similar in the two groups. Among return to activity parameters, time to resumption of daily activities and starting climbing stairs were significantly shorter in the suture group.
The suture fixation method is a cost-effective alternative to tacker fixation in patients with small- to medium-sized defects in laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair. Suture fixation is better than tacker fixation in terms of early postoperative pain and return to activity. The two procedures are equally effective regarding the recurrence rates, complications, hospital stay, chronic pain, quality of life determinants, and patient satisfaction.
腹腔镜切口疝修补术中的网片固定技术存在争议。缺乏比较各种网片固定方法的随机试验的文献。本研究旨在比较两种网片固定方法的成本效益和长期结果。
将 110 名患者随机分为钉枪网片固定组或缝线网片固定组。纳入非复发性疝、缺损大小 2-5cm 的患者。计算成本和增量成本效益比。采用 SF-36v2 健康调查进行生活质量分析。定期随访患者,记录活动恢复和满意度评分。
两组患者的人口统计学特征和疝特征相似。手术时间明显延长(p<0),缝线组术后 1h、6h 和 1 个月的早期术后疼痛明显降低。在平均 32.2 个月的随访中,慢性疼痛和血清肿形成的发生率无显著差异。组 I 的手术费用明显较高(p<0.001)。缝线固定比钉枪固定更具成本效益。两组术后生活质量结果相似。在活动恢复参数中,缝线组恢复日常活动和开始爬楼梯的时间明显短于钉枪组。
在腹腔镜切口疝和腹疝修补中小至中等大小缺损患者中,缝线固定是钉枪固定的一种具有成本效益的替代方法。缝线固定在术后早期疼痛和恢复活动方面优于钉枪固定。两种手术在复发率、并发症、住院时间、慢性疼痛、生活质量决定因素和患者满意度方面同样有效。