Hashiloni-Dolev Yael, Shkedi Shiri
The Academic College of Tel-Aviv-Yaffo, Rabenu Yeruham 14, Yaffo, 68114, Israel.
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Nov;65(10):2081-92. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.06.016. Epub 2007 Jul 31.
This paper discusses the policy debate and ethical discussion surrounding pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for sibling donor (SD) in Germany and Israel. Based on an analysis of the regulations and ethical discourse concerning a unique form of new reproductive technology (NRT)--PGD for SD--we complement the scholarly discussion of NRTs in these countries, by pointing to an explanatory factor that has been so far neglected, namely the hegemonic notions regarding the ideal relationship between the generations, and the mutual obligations between different family members in Germany and Israel. We argue the fact that PGD (in general) and PGD for SD (in particular) have been banned in Germany, but were endorsed without hesitation in Israel, has to do with different perceptions of family ethics within the two societies. Furthermore, we argue that this factor contributes significantly to the more general understanding of German and Israeli policies regarding NRTs.
本文探讨了德国和以色列围绕为同胞供体进行胚胎植入前基因诊断(PGD)的政策辩论和伦理讨论。基于对一种独特的新型生殖技术(NRT)形式——为同胞供体进行PGD——的相关法规和伦理话语的分析,我们通过指出一个迄今为止被忽视的解释性因素,即关于德国和以色列代际间理想关系以及不同家庭成员相互义务的霸权观念,来补充这些国家对新型生殖技术的学术讨论。我们认为,PGD(总体而言)以及特别是为同胞供体进行的PGD在德国被禁止,但在以色列却被毫不犹豫地认可,这与两个社会对家庭伦理的不同认知有关。此外,我们认为这一因素对更全面理解德国和以色列关于新型生殖技术的政策有显著贡献。