Roberts V I, Esler C N, Harper W M
Trent and Wales Arthroplasty Audit Group, Leicester, UK.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Jul;89(7):864-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B7.18593.
The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) published the guidelines on the selection of prostheses for primary hip replacement in 2000. They supported the use of cemented hip prostheses to the exclusion of uncemented and hybrid implants. The information from the Trent (and Wales) Regional Arthroplasty Study has been examined to identify retrospectively the types of hip prostheses used between 1990 and 2005, and to assess the impact that the guidelines have had on orthopaedic practice. The results show that the publication of the NICE guidelines has had little impact on clinical practice, with the use of uncemented prostheses increasing from 6.7% (137) in 2001 to 19.2% (632) in 2005. The use of hybrid prostheses has more than doubled from 8.8% (181) to 22% (722) of all hips implanted in the same period. The recommendations made by NICE are not being followed, which calls into question their value.
国家临床优化研究所(NICE)于2000年发布了关于初次髋关节置换假体选择的指南。该指南支持使用骨水泥型髋关节假体,不包括非骨水泥型和混合型植入物。对特伦特(及威尔士)地区关节成形术研究的信息进行了审查,以回顾性确定1990年至2005年间使用的髋关节假体类型,并评估该指南对骨科实践的影响。结果显示,NICE指南的发布对临床实践影响甚微,非骨水泥型假体的使用从2001年的6.7%(137例)增至2005年的19.2%(632例)。同期,混合型假体的使用在所有植入髋关节中所占比例从8.8%(181例)增加了一倍多,至22%(722例)。NICE提出的建议未得到遵循,这使其价值受到质疑。