Bernstein Michael J, Young Steven G, Hugenberg Kurt
Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA.
Psychol Sci. 2007 Aug;18(8):706-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01964.x.
Although the cross-race effect (CRE) is a well-established phenomenon, both perceptual-expertise and social-categorization models have been proposed to explain the effect. The two studies reported here investigated the extent to which categorizing other people as in-group versus out-group members is sufficient to elicit a pattern of face recognition analogous to that of the CRE, even when perceptual expertise with the stimuli is held constant. In Study 1, targets were categorized as members of real-life in-groups and out-groups (based on university affiliation), whereas in Study 2, targets were categorized into experimentally created minimal groups. In both studies, recognition performance was better for targets categorized as in-group members, despite the fact that perceptual expertise was equivalent for in-group and out-group faces. These results suggest that social-cognitive mechanisms of in-group and out-group categorization are sufficient to elicit performance differences for in-group and out-group face recognition.
尽管跨种族效应(CRE)是一个已被充分证实的现象,但人们提出了感知专业知识模型和社会分类模型来解释这一效应。这里报告的两项研究调查了,即使对刺激的感知专业知识保持不变,将他人归类为内群体成员还是外群体成员,在多大程度上足以引发一种类似于跨种族效应的面部识别模式。在研究1中,目标被归类为现实生活中的内群体和外群体成员(基于大学所属关系),而在研究2中,目标被归类为通过实验创建的最小群体。在两项研究中,被归类为内群体成员的目标的识别表现更好,尽管内群体和外群体面孔的感知专业知识是相同的。这些结果表明,内群体和外群体分类的社会认知机制足以引发内群体和外群体面部识别的表现差异。