Reymond M A, Schlegel W
Department of Surgery, University of Magdeburg, Germany.
Adv Clin Chem. 2007;44:103-42. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2423(07)44004-5.
Proteomic studies have generated numerous datasets of potential diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic significance in human cancer. Two key technologies underpinning these studies in cancer tissue are two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE) and mass spectrometry (MS). Although surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (SELDI-TOF)-MS is the mainstay for serum or plasma analysis, other methods including isotope-coded affinity tag technology, reverse-phase protein arrays, and antibody microarrays are emerging as alternative proteomic technologies. Because there is little overlap between studies conducted with these approaches, confirmation of these advanced technologies remains an elusive goal. This problem is further exacerbated by lack of uniform patient inclusion and exclusion criteria, low patient numbers, poor supporting clinical data, absence of standardized sample preparation, and limited analytical reproducibility (in particular of 2D-PAGE). Despite these problems, there is little doubt that the proteomic approach has the potential to identify novel diagnostic biomarkers in cancer. In therapeutic proteomics, the challenge is significant due to the complexity systems under investigation (i.e., cells generate over 10(5) different polypeptides). However, the most significant contribution of therapeutic proteomics research is expected to derive not from single experiments, but from the synthesis and comparison of large datasets obtained under different conditions (e.g., normal, inflammation, cancer) and in different tissues and organs. Thus, standardized processes for storing and retrieving data obtained with different technologies by different research groups will have to be developed. Shifting the emphasis of cancer proteomics from technology development and data generation to careful study design, data organization, formatting, and mining is crucial to answer clinical questions in cancer research.
蛋白质组学研究已经产生了大量对人类癌症具有潜在诊断、预后和治疗意义的数据集。支撑这些癌症组织研究的两项关键技术是二维聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(2D-PAGE)和质谱分析(MS)。虽然表面增强激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(SELDI-TOF-MS)是血清或血浆分析的主要方法,但包括同位素编码亲和标签技术、反相蛋白质阵列和抗体微阵列在内的其他方法正作为替代蛋白质组学技术崭露头角。由于使用这些方法进行的研究之间几乎没有重叠,对这些先进技术的验证仍然是一个难以实现的目标。缺乏统一的患者纳入和排除标准、患者数量少、临床数据支持不足、缺乏标准化的样品制备以及分析重现性有限(尤其是2D-PAGE),使这个问题进一步恶化。尽管存在这些问题,但毫无疑问,蛋白质组学方法有潜力识别癌症中的新型诊断生物标志物。在治疗蛋白质组学中,由于所研究系统的复杂性(即细胞能产生超过10^5种不同的多肽),挑战巨大。然而,治疗蛋白质组学研究最显著的贡献预计并非来自单个实验,而是来自在不同条件(如正常、炎症、癌症)下以及在不同组织和器官中获得的大型数据集的合成与比较。因此,必须开发标准化流程,用于存储和检索不同研究小组使用不同技术获得的数据。将癌症蛋白质组学的重点从技术开发和数据生成转移到精心的研究设计、数据组织、格式化和挖掘上,对于回答癌症研究中的临床问题至关重要。