Wonderlich Stephen A, Crosby Ross D, Mitchell James E, Engel Scott G
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Neuropsychiatric Research Institute, Grand Fork, North Dakota 58102, USA.
Int J Eat Disord. 2007 Nov;40 Suppl:S40-5. doi: 10.1002/eat.20437.
This paper overviews the issue of validity testing for eating disorder diagnoses.
A variety of different approaches to validity testing are reviewed, with an emphasis on clinically oriented validity testing for the DSM-V.
Validators of eating disorder diagnoses are likely to vary in terms of their scientific and clinical utility. Given that the DSM-V is a clinical document, validators which provide predictive clinical information will be most useful.
Clinicians and researchers alike may differ in their approach to validating eating disorder diagnoses depending on the purpose of the validation.
本文概述了饮食失调诊断的效度检验问题。
回顾了多种不同的效度检验方法，重点是针对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版（DSM-V）的临床导向效度检验。
饮食失调诊断的验证指标在科学和临床效用方面可能存在差异。鉴于DSM-V是一份临床文件，能够提供预测性临床信息的验证指标将最为有用。
临床医生和研究人员在验证饮食失调诊断的方法上可能因验证目的而异。
