Suppr超能文献

植入式心脏复律除颤器的除颤测试:何时进行、如何进行以及由谁进行?

Defibrillation testing of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator: when, how, and by whom?

作者信息

Pires Luis A

机构信息

Heart Rhythm Center, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, StJohn Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI 48236, USA.

出版信息

Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2007 Aug 1;7(3):166-75.

Abstract

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has become an integral part of treatment for a variety of patients with symptomatic, or at risk for, ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The ICD's effectiveness is attributed to its ability to promptly detect and terminate ventricular tachycardia (VT) and fibrillation (VF). The clinical trials that established the positive role of ICD therapy were based on patients who underwent some form of defibrillation testing at the time of implantation. Therefore, since its advent, intraoperative defibrillation testing of the ICD to assure reliable detection and termination of VT/VF has been a standard practice. But because of advances in defibrillator and lead technology, which now facilitates successful device implantation (i.e., low defibrillation energy requirement to allow for an adequate programmed safety margin) in the majority of patients, the necessity of defibrillation testing has been called into attention. Despite substantial progress, it is not altogether clear whether a wholesale abandonment of intraoperative ICD testing is appropriate at this point. We review pertinent data regarding pros and cons of ICD testing and offer a suggestion as to when, how, and who should test ICDs.

摘要

植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)已成为各类有症状或有室性快速心律失常风险患者治疗中不可或缺的一部分。ICD的有效性归因于其能迅速检测并终止室性心动过速(VT)和心室颤动(VF)。确立ICD治疗积极作用的临床试验是基于在植入时接受某种形式除颤测试的患者。因此,自其问世以来,对ICD进行术中除颤测试以确保可靠检测并终止VT/VF一直是标准做法。但由于除颤器和导线技术的进步,现在多数患者都能成功植入设备(即除颤能量需求低,以便有足够的程控安全裕度),除颤测试的必要性受到了关注。尽管取得了重大进展,但目前是否应全面放弃术中ICD测试尚不完全清楚。我们回顾了有关ICD测试利弊的相关数据,并就何时、如何以及由谁来测试ICD提出建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a38/1939869/592fe94ea73e/ipej070166-01.jpg

相似文献

4
Defibrillation Testing During Defibrillator Implantation.
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2012 Sep;1(1):51-53. doi: 10.15420/aer.2012.1.51.
5
The dilemma of ICD implant testing.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 May;30(5):675-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00730.x.
9
Defibrillation threshold testing: is it necessary during implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation?
Med Hypotheses. 2009 Feb;72(2):147-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2008.09.032. Epub 2008 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of Temporal Trends and Variation in the Use of Defibrillation Testing in Contemporary Practice.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1913553. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13553.
2
Critical analysis of ineffective post implantation implantable cardioverter-defibrillator-testing.
World J Cardiol. 2017 Feb 26;9(2):167-173. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i2.167.
3
The relationship between defibrillation threshold and total mortality.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2013 Dec;38(3):203-8. doi: 10.1007/s10840-013-9831-5. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
4
Implantation of additional subcutaneous array electrode reduces defibrillation threshold in ICD patients - preliminary results.
Arch Med Sci. 2013 Jun 20;9(3):440-4. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2013.35480. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
5
ICD implantation without intraoperative testing does not increase the rate of system modifications and does not impair defibrillation efficacy tested in follow-up.
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2013 Jun;24(2):125-30. doi: 10.1007/s00399-013-0267-5. Epub 2013 Jun 7.

本文引用的文献

1
The dilemma of ICD implant testing.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 May;30(5):675-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00730.x.
3
How to manage the patient with a high defibrillation threshold.
Heart Rhythm. 2006 Apr;3(4):492-5. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.12.023.
4
Intraoperative testing of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: how much is enough?
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006 Feb;17(2):140-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.00294.x.
5
Delayed defibrillation testing in patients implanted with biventricular ICD (CRT-D): a reliable and safe approach.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005 Dec;16(12):1279-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.00247.x.
8
The defibrillation safety margin of patients receiving ICDs: a matter of definition.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Sep;28(9):881-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00191.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验