Pires Luis A
Heart Rhythm Center, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, StJohn Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI 48236, USA.
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2007 Aug 1;7(3):166-75.
The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has become an integral part of treatment for a variety of patients with symptomatic, or at risk for, ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The ICD's effectiveness is attributed to its ability to promptly detect and terminate ventricular tachycardia (VT) and fibrillation (VF). The clinical trials that established the positive role of ICD therapy were based on patients who underwent some form of defibrillation testing at the time of implantation. Therefore, since its advent, intraoperative defibrillation testing of the ICD to assure reliable detection and termination of VT/VF has been a standard practice. But because of advances in defibrillator and lead technology, which now facilitates successful device implantation (i.e., low defibrillation energy requirement to allow for an adequate programmed safety margin) in the majority of patients, the necessity of defibrillation testing has been called into attention. Despite substantial progress, it is not altogether clear whether a wholesale abandonment of intraoperative ICD testing is appropriate at this point. We review pertinent data regarding pros and cons of ICD testing and offer a suggestion as to when, how, and who should test ICDs.
植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)已成为各类有症状或有室性快速心律失常风险患者治疗中不可或缺的一部分。ICD的有效性归因于其能迅速检测并终止室性心动过速(VT)和心室颤动(VF)。确立ICD治疗积极作用的临床试验是基于在植入时接受某种形式除颤测试的患者。因此,自其问世以来,对ICD进行术中除颤测试以确保可靠检测并终止VT/VF一直是标准做法。但由于除颤器和导线技术的进步,现在多数患者都能成功植入设备(即除颤能量需求低,以便有足够的程控安全裕度),除颤测试的必要性受到了关注。尽管取得了重大进展,但目前是否应全面放弃术中ICD测试尚不完全清楚。我们回顾了有关ICD测试利弊的相关数据,并就何时、如何以及由谁来测试ICD提出建议。