• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

未进行术中测试的植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)植入术不会增加系统修改率,也不会损害随访中测试的除颤效果。

ICD implantation without intraoperative testing does not increase the rate of system modifications and does not impair defibrillation efficacy tested in follow-up.

作者信息

Bastian Dirk, Kracker Stefan, Pauschinger Matthias, Göhl Konrad

机构信息

Division of Cardiology and Electrophysiology, Medizinische Klinik 8, Klinikum Nürnberg Süd, Breslauer Str. 201, 90471, Nuremberg, Germany.

出版信息

Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2013 Jun;24(2):125-30. doi: 10.1007/s00399-013-0267-5. Epub 2013 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00399-013-0267-5
PMID:23744101
Abstract

AIM

The need for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) defibrillation testing (DT) and subsequent intraoperative system modifications is discussed controversially. The study's goal was to prove that consequent abdication of intraoperative DT does not impair defibrillation efficacy and does not increase the rate of postoperative system revisions.

METHODS

In a prospective single-center observational study, 609 out of 648 consecutive patients underwent transvenous ICD implantation (left-sided, active can, dual coil lead, and biphasic shock waveform) waiving intraoperative DT. Defibrillation efficacy was validated prior to hospital discharge (PHD) by applying two 10 J safety margin (SM) shocks.

RESULTS

Following "schockless" implantation 580 out of 609 patients (95.2 %) met a 10 J SM with default programming. Shock path reversal provided 10 J SM in 13 out of 29 cases with initially failed DT. In four patients (0.7 %) maximum energy shocks were ineffective. There was no morbidity or mortality related to DT. The total rate of surgical ICD revisions was 1.8 %.

CONCLUSION

Routine ICD implantation without intraoperative DT does not lead to an increased rate of postoperative system modifications and does not decrease defibrillation efficacy as tested PHD.

摘要

目的

关于植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)除颤测试(DT)的必要性以及随后的术中系统修改存在争议。本研究的目的是证明术中放弃DT不会损害除颤效果,也不会增加术后系统修订率。

方法

在一项前瞻性单中心观察性研究中,648例连续患者中有609例接受了经静脉ICD植入(左侧、主动电极罐、双线圈导线和双相电击波形),放弃了术中DT。在出院前(PHD)通过施加两次10 J安全边际(SM)电击来验证除颤效果。

结果

在“无电击”植入后,609例患者中有580例(95.2%)在默认编程下达到了10 J SM。在最初DT失败的29例病例中,有13例通过电击路径反转达到了10 J SM。4例患者(0.7%)最大能量电击无效。没有与DT相关的发病率或死亡率。手术ICD修订的总发生率为1.8%。

结论

不进行术中DT的常规ICD植入不会导致术后系统修改率增加,也不会如PHD测试那样降低除颤效果。

相似文献

1
ICD implantation without intraoperative testing does not increase the rate of system modifications and does not impair defibrillation efficacy tested in follow-up.未进行术中测试的植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)植入术不会增加系统修改率,也不会损害随访中测试的除颤效果。
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2013 Jun;24(2):125-30. doi: 10.1007/s00399-013-0267-5. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
2
A randomized-controlled pilot study comparing ICD implantation with and without intraoperative defibrillation testing in patients with heart failure and severe left ventricular dysfunction: a substudy of the RAFT trial.一项比较心力衰竭和严重左心室功能障碍患者植入 ICD 并在术中进行除颤测试与不进行除颤测试的随机对照初步研究:RAFT 试验的子研究。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Dec;23(12):1313-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02393.x. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
3
The NO Regular Defibrillation testing In Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation (NORDIC ICD) trial: concept and design of a randomized, controlled trial of intra-operative defibrillation testing during de novo defibrillator implantation.NO 常规除颤测试在心脏复律除颤器植入术中(NORDIC ICD)试验:一项在新植入除颤器期间进行术中除颤测试的随机对照试验的概念和设计。
Europace. 2015 Jan;17(1):142-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu161. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
4
Defibrillation testing in everyday medical practice during implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation in France: analysis from the LEADER registry.法国植入式心脏复律除颤器植入术中日常医疗实践中的除颤测试:来自 LEADER 注册研究的分析。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2013 Nov;106(11):562-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
5
Intraoperative Defibrillation Testing Should Not Be Generally Abandoned for All ICD Procedures-A Multicenter Study on 4,572 Consecutive Patients.术中除颤测试不应一概被所有植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)手术摒弃——一项对4572例连续患者的多中心研究
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Dec;64(8):679-687. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1583767. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
6
[Is ICD-programming for double intraoperative defibrillation threshold energy safe and effective during long-time follow-up? Results of a prospective randomized multicenter study (Low-Energy Endotak Trial--LEET)].[术中双次除颤阈值能量的植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)程控在长期随访中是否安全有效?一项前瞻性随机多中心研究的结果(低能量Endotak试验——LEET)]
Z Kardiol. 1999 Feb;88(2):103-12. doi: 10.1007/s003920050266.
7
Intraoperative Defibrillation Testing of Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Systems-A Simple Issue?皮下植入式心脏复律除颤器系统的术中除颤测试——一个简单的问题?
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Mar 15;5(3):e003181. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.003181.
8
Clinical evaluation of defibrillation testing in an unselected population of 2,120 consecutive patients undergoing first implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implant.对 2120 例连续首次植入植入式心脏复律除颤器患者进行去纤颤测试的临床评估。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Sep 11;60(11):981-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.05.014. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
9
[Is the determination of the defibrillation threshold in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator still required?].[植入式心脏复律除颤器患者仍需测定除颤阈值吗?]
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2011 Dec;22(4):209-13. doi: 10.1007/s00399-011-0150-1. Epub 2011 Nov 13.
10
Multicentre comparison Of shock efficacy using single-vs. Dual-coil lead systems and Anodal vs. cathodaL polarITY defibrillation in patients undergoing transvenous cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. The MODALITY study.经静脉植入式心脏转复除颤器患者中使用单线圈与双线圈导线系统以及阳极与阴极极性除颤的电击疗效多中心比较。MODALITY研究。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015 Jun;43(1):45-54. doi: 10.1007/s10840-015-9980-9. Epub 2015 Feb 19.

本文引用的文献

1
The values of defibrillation testing at implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation: 'and then there were none'.植入式心脏转复除颤器植入时除颤测试的价值:“无一幸存”。
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2012 Jan;27(1):8-12. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e32834dc366.
2
Defibrillation threshold testing fails to show clinical benefit during long-term follow-up of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator implantation.心脏再同步治疗除颤器植入患者长期随访中,除颤阈值测试未能显示临床获益。
Europace. 2011 May;13(5):683-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq519. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
3
Defibrillation testing: philosophy and science.
除颤测试:理念与科学。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Feb;34(2):185. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02936.x. Epub 2010 Dec 7.
4
Utility of postoperative testing of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.植入式心脏复律除颤器术后检测的效用
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Feb;34(2):186-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02917.x. Epub 2010 Oct 7.
5
[Is intraoperative ICD-testing still necessary?].[术中植入式心律转复除颤器测试是否仍有必要?]
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2010 Jun;21(2):123-8. doi: 10.1007/s00399-010-0080-3.
6
Intraoperative defibrillation threshold testing during implantable cardioverter-defibrillator insertion: do we really need it?在植入式心脏复律除颤器插入术中进行术中除颤阈值测试:我们真的需要吗?
Am Heart J. 2010 Jan;159(1):98-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.10.031.
7
Does defibrillation threshold increase as left ventricular ejection fraction decreases?除颤阈值是否随着左心室射血分数的降低而升高?
Europace. 2010 Mar;12(3):385-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/eup408. Epub 2010 Jan 3.
8
Canadian Registry of ICD Implant Testing procedures (CREDIT): current practice, risks, and costs of intraoperative defibrillation testing.加拿大 ICD 植入物测试程序登记(CREDIT):术中除颤测试的当前实践、风险和成本。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Feb;21(2):177-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01616.x. Epub 2009 Oct 5.
9
Defibrillation testing: the need for a definitive trial.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Feb;21(2):183-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01620.x. Epub 2009 Oct 5.
10
Primary prevention implantation of cardioverter defibrillator without defibrillation threshold testing: 2-year follow-up.不进行除颤阈值测试的心脏复律除颤器一级预防植入:2年随访
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 May;32(5):573-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02329.x.