Ryan William, O'Connel Anne
Department of Public and Child Dental Health, Dublin Dental Hospital, Lincoln Place, Dublin 2.
J Ir Dent Assoc. 2007 Summer;53(2):87-91.
The majority of dental schools teach that use of the rubber dam is mandatory for certain procedures, e.g., endodontic therapy and adhesive dentistry. Despite this, many dentists perceive use of the rubber dam as a hindrance to dental treatment in adults and children.
This study sought to evaluate the attitude of undergraduate students towards the use of the rubber dam and elucidate if the negativity towards its use is evident in undergraduate clinics.
A structured questionnaire was developed, which sought to establish current perceptions of the use of the rubber dam in adults and children, and circulated to the current fourth and final year clinical undergraduate class in the Dublin Dental Hospital.
Isolation was identified as the main advantage of using a rubber dam and difficulty to place the main disadvantage. Some 98.5% of students believed they had received adequate training in rubber dam use for adults. While 72% of students were confident in placing a rubber dam for children, 38% felt that more training was necessary. The most commonly cited difficulty in placing a rubber dam was tight contacts. Most students are confident regarding which clamps to use. The majority of students (61%) believe that patients, especially children, prefer treatment without rubber dam isolation and that adequate isolation can be achieved without using a rubber dam. The average time spent placing the rubber dam was eight minutes for children and five minutes for adults. The students are more predisposed to using the rubber dam on adults than children for the same procedure.
Undergraduate students are not convinced that the use of a rubber dam is effective and efficient except for endodontic therapy. Students already believe that patients, both adults and children, would prefer their treatment to be conducted without a rubber dam. Teaching efficient methods of placing the rubber dam may improve students' confidence and reduce placement time so that the students will be more likely to use the rubber dam after graduation.
大多数牙科学院教导说,在某些程序中,如牙髓治疗和粘结牙科,使用橡皮障是强制性的。尽管如此,许多牙医认为使用橡皮障对成人和儿童的牙科治疗是一种阻碍。
本研究旨在评估本科生对使用橡皮障的态度,并阐明在本科诊所中对其使用的负面看法是否明显。
制定了一份结构化问卷,旨在确定目前对成人和儿童使用橡皮障的看法,并分发给都柏林牙科医院当前临床本科四年级和最后一年的班级。
隔离被认为是使用橡皮障的主要优点,而放置困难是主要缺点。约98.5%的学生认为他们在成人橡皮障使用方面接受了充分的培训。虽然72%的学生对为儿童放置橡皮障有信心,但38%的学生认为需要更多培训。放置橡皮障最常提到的困难是接触紧密。大多数学生对使用哪种夹子有信心。大多数学生(61%)认为患者,尤其是儿童,更喜欢不使用橡皮障隔离的治疗,并且不使用橡皮障也可以实现充分隔离。为儿童放置橡皮障的平均时间为8分钟,成人为5分钟。对于相同的程序,学生在成人身上比在儿童身上更倾向于使用橡皮障。
除牙髓治疗外,本科生不相信使用橡皮障是有效和高效的。学生们已经认为,成人和儿童患者都希望在不使用橡皮障的情况下进行治疗。教授放置橡皮障的有效方法可能会提高学生的信心并减少放置时间,以便学生毕业后更有可能使用橡皮障。